Quadro P3200 vs Radeon R9 M395X

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M395X with Quadro P3200, including specs and performance data.

R9 M395X
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
13.51

P3200 outperforms R9 M395X by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking382249
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.4221.07
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameAmethystGP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481792
Core clock speed723 MHz1328 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1543 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate92.54172.8
Floating-point processing power2.961 TFLOPS5.53 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs128112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s168.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-
Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
Mantle+-
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M395X 13.51
Quadro P3200 22.92
+69.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M395X 5194
Quadro P3200 8810
+69.6%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 M395X 7921
Quadro P3200 12555
+58.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
−70%
85
+70%
4K16−18
−75%
28
+75%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−78.3%
40−45
+78.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−70.4%
45−50
+70.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−61.4%
70−75
+61.4%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−78.3%
40−45
+78.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−70.4%
45−50
+70.4%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−80%
95−100
+80%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−74.3%
60−65
+74.3%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−64.9%
60−65
+64.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−50%
50−55
+50%
Valorant 50−55
−70.4%
90−95
+70.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−61.4%
70−75
+61.4%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−78.3%
40−45
+78.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−70.4%
45−50
+70.4%
Dota 2 45−50
+22.5%
40
−22.5%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−43.1%
73
+43.1%
Fortnite 75−80
−53.9%
110−120
+53.9%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−80%
95−100
+80%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−74.3%
60−65
+74.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−61.2%
75−80
+61.2%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−64.9%
60−65
+64.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−49.5%
140−150
+49.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−50%
50−55
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−78%
70−75
+78%
Valorant 50−55
−70.4%
90−95
+70.4%
World of Tanks 180−190
−37.8%
240−250
+37.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−61.4%
70−75
+61.4%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−78.3%
40−45
+78.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−70.4%
45−50
+70.4%
Dota 2 45−50
−129%
112
+129%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−43.1%
70−75
+43.1%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−80%
95−100
+80%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−74.3%
60−65
+74.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−49.5%
140−150
+49.5%
Valorant 50−55
−70.4%
90−95
+70.4%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 18−20
−100%
35−40
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−90%
35−40
+90%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−67.3%
170−180
+67.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−75%
21−24
+75%
World of Tanks 95−100
−61.1%
150−160
+61.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−70.4%
45−50
+70.4%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−90%
18−20
+90%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−103%
65−70
+103%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−81.8%
60−65
+81.8%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−76.2%
35−40
+76.2%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−79.3%
50−55
+79.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−83.3%
30−35
+83.3%
Valorant 30−35
−84.8%
60−65
+84.8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−122%
20−22
+122%
Dota 2 24−27
−62.5%
35−40
+62.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−62.5%
35−40
+62.5%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−72.5%
65−70
+72.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−62.5%
35−40
+62.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−91.7%
21−24
+91.7%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−122%
20−22
+122%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Dota 2 24−27
−62.5%
35−40
+62.5%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Fortnite 14−16
−86.7%
27−30
+86.7%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−90%
18−20
+90%
Valorant 14−16
−107%
27−30
+107%

This is how R9 M395X and Quadro P3200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P3200 is 70% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P3200 is 75% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M395X is 23% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P3200 is 129% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R9 M395X is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • Quadro P3200 is ahead in 62 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.51 22.92
Recency 5 May 2015 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro P3200 has a 69.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M395X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M395X is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M395X
Radeon R9 M395X
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 15 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M395X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 304 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.