Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD Radeon R9 M390
Combined performance score
Radeon R9 M390 outperforms GeForce MX150 by 67% in our combined benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 418 | 553 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | no data | 1.25 |
Architecture | GCN (2011−2017) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
GPU code name | Pitcairn | N17S-G1 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 9 June 2015 (8 years old) | 16 May 2017 (6 years old) |
Current price | no data | $1049 |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 384 |
Core clock speed | no data | 1468 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1532 MHz |
Number of transistors | 5000 Million | 1,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 25 Watt (10 - 25 Watt TGP) |
Texture fill rate | no data | 24.91 |
Floating-point performance | no data | 1,127 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on Radeon R9 M390 and GeForce MX150 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | large | large |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | no data | 6008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 40.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
Eyefinity | 1 | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
AppAcceleration | - | no data |
Enduro | - | no data |
FreeSync | 1 | no data |
HD3D | + | no data |
PowerTune | + | no data |
DualGraphics | 1 | no data |
TrueAudio | - | no data |
ZeroCore | + | no data |
Switchable graphics | 1 | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.2 |
Vulkan | no data | 1.2.131 |
Mantle | + | no data |
CUDA | no data | 6.1 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Radeon R9 M390 outperforms GeForce MX150 by 67% in our combined benchmark results.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Radeon R9 M390 outperforms GeForce MX150 by 52% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 43
+59.3%
| 27
−59.3%
|
1440p | 40−45
+66.7%
| 24
−66.7%
|
4K | 20
+5.3%
| 19
−5.3%
|
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+50%
|
10−11
−50%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 20−22
+5.3%
|
19
−5.3%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
+150%
|
6−7
−150%
|
Battlefield 5 | 30−35
−18.2%
|
39
+18.2%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 24−27
+18.2%
|
22
−18.2%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+36.4%
|
11
−36.4%
|
Far Cry 5 | 24−27
+41.2%
|
17
−41.2%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27
+44.4%
|
18
−44.4%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+40%
|
25
−40%
|
Hitman 3 | 24−27
+78.6%
|
14−16
−78.6%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 20−22
+66.7%
|
12
−66.7%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18
+21.4%
|
14
−21.4%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
+23.5%
|
17
−23.5%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 16−18
+21.4%
|
14
−21.4%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 20−22
+53.8%
|
13
−53.8%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
+150%
|
6−7
−150%
|
Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+3.1%
|
32
−3.1%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 24−27
+271%
|
7
−271%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+114%
|
7
−114%
|
Far Cry 5 | 24−27
+50%
|
16
−50%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27
+52.9%
|
17
−52.9%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+66.7%
|
21
−66.7%
|
Hitman 3 | 24−27
+78.6%
|
14−16
−78.6%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 20−22
+81.8%
|
10−12
−81.8%
|
Metro Exodus | 14−16
+150%
|
6
−150%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18
+54.5%
|
10−12
−54.5%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
+90.9%
|
11
−90.9%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 31
+63.2%
|
19
−63.2%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 16−18
+54.5%
|
11
−54.5%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 20−22
+186%
|
7
−186%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
+150%
|
6−7
−150%
|
Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+26.9%
|
26
−26.9%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+50%
|
10−11
−50%
|
Far Cry 5 | 24−27
+71.4%
|
14
−71.4%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27
+73.3%
|
15
−73.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+150%
|
14
−150%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18
+63.6%
|
11
−63.6%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 16−18
+88.9%
|
9−10
−88.9%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14−16
+55.6%
|
9−10
−55.6%
|
Hitman 3 | 14−16
+50%
|
10
−50%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 16−18
+33.3%
|
12−14
−33.3%
|
Metro Exodus | 8−9
+100%
|
4−5
−100%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 12−14
+44.4%
|
9−10
−44.4%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 9−10
+125%
|
4−5
−125%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
Battlefield 5 | 16−18
+433%
|
3−4
−433%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
Far Cry 5 | 14−16
+66.7%
|
9−10
−66.7%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 16−18
+167%
|
6−7
−167%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+100%
|
9−10
−100%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
+80%
|
5−6
−80%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
Hitman 3 | 9−10
+50%
|
6−7
−50%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12
+500%
|
2−3
−500%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
Battlefield 5 | 8−9
+700%
|
1−2
−700%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 8−9
+60%
|
5−6
−60%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+140%
|
5−6
−140%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
This is how R9 M390 and GeForce MX150 compete in popular games:
1080p resolution:
- R9 M390 is 59.3% faster than GeForce MX150
1440p resolution:
- R9 M390 is 66.7% faster than GeForce MX150
4K resolution:
- R9 M390 is 5.3% faster than GeForce MX150
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R9 M390 is 700% faster than the GeForce MX150.
- in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX150 is 18.2% faster than the R9 M390.
All in all, in popular games:
- R9 M390 is ahead in 64 tests (97%)
- GeForce MX150 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
- there's a draw in 1 test (2%)
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 9.80 | 5.88 |
Recency | 9 June 2015 | 16 May 2017 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
The Radeon R9 M390 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX150 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.