Radeon RX 6950 XT vs R9 M380

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

R9 M380
2015
4096 MB GDDR5
7.14

RX 6950 XT outperforms R9 M380 by a whopping 926% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking51114
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data22.39
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameStrato Pro GDDR5Navi
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date16 June 2015 (8 years ago)10 May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,099
Current priceno data$961 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7685120
Core clock speed1000 MHz1925 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2324 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data335 Watt
Texture fill rate48.00743.7
Floating-point performance1,536 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 M380 and Radeon RX 6950 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Eyefinity1no data
HDMIno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
PowerTune+no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore+no data
Switchable graphics1no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.1
Vulkanno data1.3
Mantle+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M380 7.14
RX 6950 XT 73.24
+926%

RX 6950 XT outperforms R9 M380 by 926% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 M380 2762
RX 6950 XT 28340
+926%

RX 6950 XT outperforms R9 M380 by 926% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−948%
220
+948%
1440p12−14
−1058%
139
+1058%
4K8−9
−1000%
88
+1000%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−1364%
161
+1364%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−693%
110−120
+693%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−1333%
120−130
+1333%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−604%
160−170
+604%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−780%
170−180
+780%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−1200%
143
+1200%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−965%
181
+965%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−744%
152
+744%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−758%
200−210
+758%
Hitman 3 16−18
−1147%
210−220
+1147%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1050%
160−170
+1050%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−846%
120−130
+846%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1625%
276
+1625%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−1082%
130
+1082%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−693%
110−120
+693%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−1333%
120−130
+1333%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−604%
160−170
+604%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−780%
170−180
+780%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−1064%
128
+1064%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−918%
173
+918%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−717%
147
+717%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−758%
200−210
+758%
Hitman 3 16−18
−1147%
210−220
+1147%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1050%
160−170
+1050%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−1790%
189
+1790%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−846%
120−130
+846%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−1506%
257
+1506%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−2407%
376
+2407%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−945%
115
+945%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−693%
110−120
+693%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−1333%
120−130
+1333%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−604%
160−170
+604%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−1009%
122
+1009%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−865%
164
+865%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−633%
132
+633%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−758%
200−210
+758%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1340%
216
+1340%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−873%
107
+873%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−1118%
130−140
+1118%
Hitman 3 10−12
−1400%
160−170
+1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−862%
120−130
+862%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−2300%
120
+2300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1340%
70−75
+1340%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−1770%
187
+1770%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1267%
80−85
+1267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−4550%
90−95
+4550%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−1625%
130−140
+1625%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3000%
93
+3000%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−1382%
163
+1382%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−1367%
132
+1367%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−1491%
170−180
+1491%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2200%
130−140
+2200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−5050%
103
+5050%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1560%
80−85
+1560%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1271%
95−100
+1271%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−950%
80−85
+950%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−7600%
77
+7600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1100%
45−50
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−3200%
99
+3200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−3500%
144
+3500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1375%
55−60
+1375%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1867%
55−60
+1867%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−3133%
95−100
+3133%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4500%
46
+4500%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1967%
124
+1967%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−1211%
118
+1211%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1743%
120−130
+1743%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−6400%
65
+6400%

This is how R9 M380 and RX 6950 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6950 XT is 948% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6950 XT is 1058% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6950 XT is 1000% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6950 XT is 7600% faster than the R9 M380.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6950 XT surpassed R9 M380 in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.14 73.24
Recency 16 June 2015 10 May 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

The Radeon RX 6950 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M380 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M380 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6950 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M380
Radeon R9 M380
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
Radeon RX 6950 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2587 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6950 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.