Quadro RTX A6000 vs Radeon R9 M380

Place in the ranking	545	38
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	10.80
Power efficiency	no data	13.45
Architecture	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Strato	GA102
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	5 May 2015 (9 years ago)	5 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$4,649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	10752
Core clock speed	900 MHz	1410 MHz
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz	1800 MHz
Number of transistors	2,080 million	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	48.00	604.8
Floating-point processing power	1.536 TFLOPS	38.71 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	112
TMUs	48	336
Tensor Cores	no data	336
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	48 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	768.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Eyefinity	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
HD3D	+	-
PowerTune	+	-
DualGraphics	+	-
TrueAudio	+	-
ZeroCore	+	-
Switchable graphics	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.3	6.7
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	Not Listed	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
Mantle	+	-
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M380 7.21

RTX A6000 58.62
+713%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M380 2771

RTX A6000 22535
+713%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	21−24 −733%	175 +733%
1440p	14−16 −821%	129 +821%
4K	14−16 −714%	114 +714%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	26.57
1440p	no data	36.04
4K	no data	40.78

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −800%	130−140 +800%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −843%	130−140 +843%
Elden Ring	18−20 −1053%	210−220 +1053%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −409%	110−120 +409%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −800%	130−140 +800%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −843%	130−140 +843%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −934%	300 +934%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −247%	66 +247%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −435%	100−110 +435%
Valorant	24−27 −988%	260−270 +988%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −409%	110−120 +409%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −800%	130−140 +800%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −843%	130−140 +843%
Dota 2	24−27 −428%	132 +428%
Elden Ring	18−20 −1053%	210−220 +1053%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −144%	78 +144%
Fortnite	40−45 −437%	230−240 +437%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −910%	293 +910%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −412%	128 +412%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −311%	78 +311%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −271%	210−220 +271%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −435%	100−110 +435%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −691%	170−180 +691%
Valorant	24−27 −988%	260−270 +988%
World of Tanks	110−120 −151%	270−280 +151%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −409%	110−120 +409%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −800%	130−140 +800%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −843%	130−140 +843%
Dota 2	24−27 −424%	131 +424%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −266%	110−120 +266%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −893%	288 +893%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60 −271%	210−220 +271%
Valorant	24−27 −988%	260−270 +988%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	7−8 −1271%	96 +1271%
Elden Ring	9−10 −1478%	140−150 +1478%
Grand Theft Auto V	8−9 −1100%	96 +1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −349%	170−180 +349%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −1033%	65−70 +1033%
World of Tanks	50−55 −640%	350−400 +640%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −569%	85−90 +569%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −620%	70−75 +620%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1340%	70−75 +1340%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −967%	160−170 +967%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −1664%	247 +1664%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −473%	63 +473%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −1244%	120−130 +1244%
Valorant	18−20 −1161%	220−230 +1161%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2 −6700%	65−70 +6700%
Dota 2	18−20 −761%	155 +761%
Elden Ring	4−5 −1700%	70−75 +1700%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −761%	155 +761%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −2233%	70 +2233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −890%	200−210 +890%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −780%	40−45 +780%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −761%	155 +761%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −1133%	70−75 +1133%
Counter-Strike 2	1−2 −6700%	65−70 +6700%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1600%	30−35 +1600%
Dota 2	18−20 −611%	128 +611%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1213%	100−110 +1213%
Fortnite	7−8 −1271%	95−100 +1271%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −2029%	149 +2029%
Valorant	7−8 −1714%	120−130 +1714%

This is how R9 M380 and RTX A6000 compete in popular games:

RTX A6000 is 733% faster in 1080p
RTX A6000 is 821% faster in 1440p
RTX A6000 is 714% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A6000 is 6700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX A6000 surpassed R9 M380 in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.21	58.62
Recency	5 May 2015	5 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	48 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm

RTX A6000 has a 713% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX A6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M380 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M380 is a notebook card while Quadro RTX A6000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.