AMD Radeon R9 M375 vs 530
Comparison of Radeon R9 M375 and Radeon 530 architecture, market type and release date.
Radeon R9 M375 and Radeon 530's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon R9 M375 and Radeon 530's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
40.6 GTexel / s
24.5 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Radeon R9 M375 and Radeon 530 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on Radeon R9 M375 and Radeon 530: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
DDR3 / GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
28.8 GB / s
28.8 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon R9 M375 and Radeon 530.
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Radeon R9 M375 and Radeon 530. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
APIs supported by Radeon R9 M375 and Radeon 530, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Radeon R9 M375 and Radeon 530. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
R9 M375 6.44 +0.9%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
R9 M375 8466 +8.6%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
R9 M375 1514 +15.8%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
R9 M375 1667 +14.6%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
R9 M375 3314 +42.6%
3DMark Vantage Performance
R9 M375 8275 +30.6%
R9 M375 1239 +0.7%
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Radeon R9 M375 and Radeon 530. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
Let's see how good Radeon R9 M375 and Radeon 530 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 M375
0.9% faster in synthetic tests
Wider memory bus (128 vs 64 bit)
More pipelines (640 vs 384)
DirectX 12 (FL 11_1)
OpenGL 4.3 (Open Graphics Library - an API for 3D graphics and GPUs usage)
PowerTune (dynamically increases AMD GPU's voltage and frequency while there's still enough temperature headroom. Similar to NVIDIA GPU Boost)
Enduro (saves battery charge by automatically switching between an integrated and discrete AMD GPU depending on workload. Similar to NVIDIA Optimus)
Eyefinity (allows using several displays with an AMD GPU)
Advantages of AMD Radeon 530
Much newer (18 April 2017 vs 5 May 2015)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
So, R9 M375 or 530?
Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Radeon R9 M375 and AMD Radeon 530. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Radeon R9 M375 and Radeon 530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.