Quadro P4200 vs Radeon R9 M375

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M375 with Quadro P4200, including specs and performance data.

R9 M375
2015
4 GB DDR3
2.36

P4200 outperforms R9 M375 by a whopping 881% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking871252
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data17.63
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTropoGP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date5 May 2015 (10 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6402304
Compute units10no data
Core clock speed1000 MHz1227 MHz
Boost clock speed1015 MHz1647 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rate40.60237.2
Floating-point processing power1.299 TFLOPS7.589 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs40144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1100 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s192.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-
Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
Mantle+-
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 M375 2.36
Quadro P4200 23.14
+881%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M375 991
Quadro P4200 10490
+959%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
−857%
220−230
+857%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−2600%
130−140
+2600%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−920%
50−55
+920%
Sons of the Forest 0−1 50−55

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−1243%
90−95
+1243%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−2600%
130−140
+2600%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−920%
50−55
+920%
Far Cry 5 15
−413%
75−80
+413%
Fortnite 22
−432%
110−120
+432%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−683%
90−95
+683%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−1380%
70−75
+1380%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 17
−441%
90−95
+441%
Sons of the Forest 0−1 50−55
Valorant 40−45
−290%
160−170
+290%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−1243%
90−95
+1243%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−2600%
130−140
+2600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
−445%
250−260
+445%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−920%
50−55
+920%
Dota 2 33
−267%
120−130
+267%
Far Cry 5 13
−492%
75−80
+492%
Fortnite 16
−631%
110−120
+631%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−683%
90−95
+683%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
−1380%
70−75
+1380%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−1333%
85−90
+1333%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1200%
50−55
+1200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16
−475%
90−95
+475%
Sons of the Forest 0−1 50−55
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Valorant 40−45
−290%
160−170
+290%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−1243%
90−95
+1243%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−920%
50−55
+920%
Dota 2 30
−303%
120−130
+303%
Far Cry 5 12
−542%
75−80
+542%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−683%
90−95
+683%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 13
−608%
90−95
+608%
Sons of the Forest 0−1 50−55
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−678%
70−75
+678%
Valorant 40−45
−290%
160−170
+290%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−875%
110−120
+875%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−1175%
50−55
+1175%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−888%
160−170
+888%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−4200%
40−45
+4200%
Metro Exodus 0−1 30−35
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−661%
170−180
+661%
Valorant 20−22
−910%
200−210
+910%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1700%
50−55
+1700%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−917%
60−65
+917%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1800%
35−40
+1800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−1300%
55−60
+1300%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−193%
40−45
+193%
Valorant 12−14
−1050%
130−140
+1050%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 6−7
−1200%
75−80
+1200%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2700%
27−30
+2700%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4000%
40−45
+4000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−733%
24−27
+733%
Sons of the Forest 0−1 18−20

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−767%
24−27
+767%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Sons of the Forest 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how R9 M375 and Quadro P4200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is 857% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 4200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is ahead in 51 tests (86%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.36 23.14
Recency 5 May 2015 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm

Quadro P4200 has a 880.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M375 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M375 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R9 M375
NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 59 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 61 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M375 or Quadro P4200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.