RX 6600 XT vs R9 M295X

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

R9 M295X
13.29

RX 6600 XT outperforms R9 M295X by 220% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking35478
Place by popularitynot in top-10056
Value for moneyno data46.75
ArchitectureGCN 3 (2014−2016)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameTongaNavi 23
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date16 October 2014 (9 years old)30 July 2021 (2 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$379
Current priceno data$283 (0.7x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482048
Core clock speed723 MHz1968 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2589 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt160 (TGP) Watt
Texture fill rate92.54331.4
Floating-point performance2,961 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 M295X and Radeon RX 6600 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount0 MB8 GB
Memory bus widthNot Listed128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
PowerTune+no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore+no data
Switchable graphics1no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNot Listed12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.1
Vulkanno data1.2
Mantle+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M295X 13.29
RX 6600 XT 42.48
+220%

RX 6600 XT outperforms R9 M295X by 220% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 M295X 5150
RX 6600 XT 16463
+220%

RX 6600 XT outperforms R9 M295X by 220% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R9 M295X 29972
RX 6600 XT 88163
+194%

RX 6600 XT outperforms R9 M295X by 194% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R9 M295X 8851
RX 6600 XT 39051
+341%

RX 6600 XT outperforms R9 M295X by 341% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 M295X 6591
RX 6600 XT 28342
+330%

RX 6600 XT outperforms R9 M295X by 330% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 M295X 38132
RX 6600 XT 156297
+310%

RX 6600 XT outperforms R9 M295X by 310% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD48
−175%
132
+175%
1440p21−24
−252%
74
+252%
4K31
−32.3%
41
+32.3%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−276%
79
+276%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−164%
70−75
+164%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−486%
129
+486%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−161%
120−130
+161%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−241%
110−120
+241%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−271%
78
+271%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−344%
151
+344%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−264%
131
+264%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−172%
120−130
+172%
Hitman 3 35−40
−514%
221
+514%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−389%
137
+389%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−209%
65−70
+209%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−493%
166
+493%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−380%
120
+380%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−164%
70−75
+164%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−382%
106
+382%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−161%
120−130
+161%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−241%
110−120
+241%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−262%
76
+262%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−315%
141
+315%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−253%
127
+253%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−172%
120−130
+172%
Hitman 3 35−40
−408%
183
+408%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−289%
109
+289%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−375%
95
+375%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−209%
65−70
+209%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−407%
142
+407%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
−376%
176
+376%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−316%
104
+316%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−164%
70−75
+164%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−241%
75
+241%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−161%
120−130
+161%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−229%
69
+229%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−291%
133
+291%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−211%
112
+211%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−172%
120−130
+172%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−482%
99
+482%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−144%
61
+144%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−279%
70−75
+279%
Hitman 3 21−24
−433%
112
+433%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−300%
76
+300%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−367%
56
+367%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−394%
84
+394%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−254%
45−50
+254%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−460%
56
+460%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−226%
85−90
+226%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−471%
40
+471%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−400%
105
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−308%
98
+308%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−250%
90−95
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−392%
60−65
+392%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−450%
44
+450%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Hitman 3 12−14
−375%
57
+375%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−100%
20
+100%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−467%
34
+467%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−229%
21−24
+229%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−400%
40
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−286%
54
+286%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−263%
27−30
+263%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−367%
28
+367%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−300%
50−55
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−600%
14
+600%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−364%
51
+364%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−308%
53
+308%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−380%
24
+380%

This is how R9 M295X and RX 6600 XT compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RX 6600 XT is 175% faster than R9 M295X

1440p resolution:

  • RX 6600 XT is 252% faster than R9 M295X

4K resolution:

  • RX 6600 XT is 32.3% faster than R9 M295X

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6600 XT is 600% faster than the R9 M295X.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6600 XT surpassed R9 M295X in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 13.29 42.48
Recency 16 October 2014 30 July 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 160 Watt

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M295X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M295X is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M295X
Radeon R9 M295X
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 17 votes

Rate AMD Radeon R9 M295X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3516 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.