Quadro P4200 vs Radeon R9 M295X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M295X with Quadro P4200, including specs and performance data.

R9 M295X
2014
0 MB Not Listed, 250 Watt
12.29

P4200 outperforms R9 M295X by an impressive 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking422253
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.7517.64
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameAmethystGP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date23 November 2014 (10 years ago)21 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482304
Core clock speed723 MHz1227 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1647 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate92.54237.2
Floating-point processing power2.961 TFLOPS7.589 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs128144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount0 MB8 GB
Memory bus widthNot Listed256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s192.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-
Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNot Listed12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
Mantle+-
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 M295X 12.29
Quadro P4200 23.14
+88.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M295X 5150
Quadro P4200 10406
+102%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD48
−87.5%
90−95
+87.5%
4K26
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
−94.2%
130−140
+94.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−96.2%
50−55
+96.2%
Sons of the Forest 24−27
−108%
50−55
+108%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−70.9%
90−95
+70.9%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
−94.2%
130−140
+94.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−96.2%
50−55
+96.2%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−87.8%
75−80
+87.8%
Fortnite 70−75
−60.3%
110−120
+60.3%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−77.4%
90−95
+77.4%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−92.3%
75−80
+92.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−104%
90−95
+104%
Sons of the Forest 24−27
−108%
50−55
+108%
Valorant 100−110
−50.5%
160−170
+50.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−70.9%
90−95
+70.9%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
−94.2%
130−140
+94.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
−44.6%
250−260
+44.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−96.2%
50−55
+96.2%
Dota 2 80−85
−45.8%
120−130
+45.8%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−87.8%
75−80
+87.8%
Fortnite 70−75
−60.3%
110−120
+60.3%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−77.4%
90−95
+77.4%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−92.3%
75−80
+92.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−83%
85−90
+83%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−100%
50−55
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−104%
90−95
+104%
Sons of the Forest 24−27
−108%
50−55
+108%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
−89.2%
70−75
+89.2%
Valorant 100−110
−50.5%
160−170
+50.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−70.9%
90−95
+70.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−96.2%
50−55
+96.2%
Dota 2 80−85
−45.8%
120−130
+45.8%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−87.8%
75−80
+87.8%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−77.4%
90−95
+77.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−104%
90−95
+104%
Sons of the Forest 24−27
−108%
50−55
+108%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−312%
70−75
+312%
Valorant 100−110
−50.5%
160−170
+50.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
−60.3%
110−120
+60.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−108%
50−55
+108%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
−78.7%
160−170
+78.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−121%
40−45
+121%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−107%
30−35
+107%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
−76.8%
170−180
+76.8%
Valorant 130−140
−53%
200−210
+53%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−94.1%
65−70
+94.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−109%
21−24
+109%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−100%
50−55
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−100%
60−65
+100%
Sons of the Forest 14−16
−129%
30−35
+129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−111%
35−40
+111%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
−107%
55−60
+107%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−229%
21−24
+229%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−83.3%
40−45
+83.3%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−150%
20−22
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−150%
35−40
+150%
Valorant 65−70
−106%
130−140
+106%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−112%
35−40
+112%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−229%
21−24
+229%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Dota 2 45−50
−73.3%
75−80
+73.3%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−115%
27−30
+115%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−95.2%
40−45
+95.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−108%
24−27
+108%
Sons of the Forest 8−9
−138%
18−20
+138%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−117%
24−27
+117%

This is how R9 M295X and Quadro P4200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is 88% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P4200 is 73% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 312% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P4200 surpassed R9 M295X in all 65 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.29 23.14
Recency 23 November 2014 21 February 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 100 Watt

Quadro P4200 has a 88.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M295X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M295X is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M295X
Radeon R9 M295X
NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 18 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M295X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 61 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M295X or Quadro P4200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.