Radeon Vega 7 vs R9 Fury

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 Fury with Radeon Vega 7, including specs and performance data.

R9 Fury
2015
4 GB High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), 275 Watt
23.91
+233%

R9 Fury outperforms Vega 7 by a whopping 233% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking226536
Place by popularitynot in top-10012
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.86no data
Power efficiency6.2211.43
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameFijiCezanne
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 July 2015 (9 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584448
Compute units56no data
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate224.053.20
Floating-point processing power7.168 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs22428

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors​2x 8-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)System Shared
High bandwidth memory (HBM)+no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width4096 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth512 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan+1.2
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 Fury 23.91
+233%
Vega 7 7.19

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R9 Fury 17543
+234%
Vega 7 5249

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 Fury 14580
+336%
Vega 7 3348

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R9 Fury 80439
+225%
Vega 7 24726

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD89
+287%
23
−287%
1440p97
+288%
25
−288%
4K49
+227%
15
−227%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.17no data
1440p5.66no data
4K11.20no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+257%
14−16
−257%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+217%
24−27
−217%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+257%
14−16
−257%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+276%
29
−276%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+267%
18
−267%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+210%
21
−210%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+100%
27
−100%
Valorant 100−105
+245%
29
−245%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+217%
24−27
−217%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+257%
14−16
−257%
Dota 2 85−90
+406%
17
−406%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+175%
28
−175%
Fortnite 120−130
+184%
40−45
−184%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+354%
24
−354%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+288%
16−18
−288%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+254%
24−27
−254%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+333%
15
−333%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+239%
46
−239%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+230%
21−24
−230%
Valorant 100−105
+614%
14
−614%
World of Tanks 268
+362%
58
−362%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+217%
24−27
−217%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+188%
16−18
−188%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+257%
14−16
−257%
Dota 2 130
+271%
35−40
−271%
Far Cry 5 101
+206%
30−35
−206%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+419%
21
−419%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+450%
12
−450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+160%
60−65
−160%
Valorant 100−105
+300%
25
−300%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 40−45
+367%
9−10
−367%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+250%
12−14
−250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+250%
50−55
−250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
World of Tanks 158
+193%
50−55
−193%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+285%
12−14
−285%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+267%
6−7
−267%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+350%
16−18
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+340%
14−16
−340%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+264%
10−12
−264%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+418%
10−12
−418%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+270%
10−11
−270%
Valorant 65−70
+253%
18−20
−253%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Dota 2 47
+161%
18−20
−161%
Grand Theft Auto V 47
+236%
14−16
−236%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+245%
21−24
−245%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+161%
18−20
−161%
World of Tanks 109
+263%
30−33
−263%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+333%
6−7
−333%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Dota 2 102
+240%
30−33
−240%
Far Cry 5 38
+322%
9−10
−322%
Fortnite 35
+400%
7−8
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+322%
9−10
−322%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Valorant 30−35
+357%
7−8
−357%

This is how R9 Fury and Vega 7 compete in popular games:

  • R9 Fury is 287% faster in 1080p
  • R9 Fury is 288% faster in 1440p
  • R9 Fury is 227% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 Fury is 614% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, R9 Fury surpassed Vega 7 in all 51 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.91 7.19
Recency 10 July 2015 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 45 Watt

R9 Fury has a 232.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Vega 7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 511.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R9 Fury is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Vega 7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 Fury is a desktop card while Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Radeon R9 Fury
AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 178 votes

Rate Radeon R9 Fury on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 2332 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.