Arc A370M vs Radeon R9 FURY X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
255 OEM 260 OEM 270 270 1024SP 270X 280 280X 280X2 285 290 290X 290X2 295X2 360 OEM 370 370 1024SP 370X 380 380 OEM 380X 390 390 X2 390X 390X2 A375 Fury FURY X FURY X2 Nano
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A350M A370M A380M A530M A550M A570M A730M A770M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 FURY X with Arc A370M, including specs and performance data.

R9 FURY X
2015, $649
4 GB High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), 275 Watt
22.42
+83.3%

R9 FURY X outperforms A370M by an impressive 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R9 FURY X R9 FURY X
Arc A370M Arc A370M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking285444
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.81no data
Power efficiency6.2826.91
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameFijiDG2-128
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date24 June 2015 (10 years ago)30 March 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961024
Compute units64no data
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate268.899.20
Floating-point processing power8.602 TFLOPS3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs25664
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L1 Cache1 MB1.5 MB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length195 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHigh Bandwidth Memory (HBM)GDDR6
High bandwidth memory (HBM)+no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1050 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth512 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 1.4a, 3x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+1.3
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 FURY X 22.42
+83.3%
Arc A370M 12.23

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 FURY X 9380
+83.4%
Samples: 197
Arc A370M 5115
Samples: 2

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 FURY X 16710
+105%
Arc A370M 8149

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70−75
+79.5%
39
−79.5%
1440p35−40
+75%
20
−75%
4K60−65
+76.5%
34
−76.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.27no data
1440p18.54no data
4K10.82no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+0%
46
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 46
+0%
46
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+0%
37
+0%
Far Cry 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Dota 2 68
+0%
68
+0%
Far Cry 5 46
+0%
46
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 28
+0%
28
+0%
Metro Exodus 34
+0%
34
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
+0%
53
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
+0%
21
+0%
Dota 2 66
+0%
66
+0%
Far Cry 5 43
+0%
43
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+0%
26
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
+0%
11
+0%
Metro Exodus 20
+0%
20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 29
+0%
29
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 40
+0%
40
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how R9 FURY X and Arc A370M compete in popular games:

  • R9 FURY X is 79% faster in 1080p
  • R9 FURY X is 75% faster in 1440p
  • R9 FURY X is 76% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 22.42 12.23
Recency 24 June 2015 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 35 Watt

R9 FURY X has a 83% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc A370M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 367% more advanced lithography process, and 686% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R9 FURY X is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A370M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 FURY X is a desktop graphics card while Arc A370M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R9 FURY X Radeon R9 FURY X
vs
RX 590 Radeon RX 590
Arc A370M Arc A370M
vs
R9 M395X Radeon R9 M395X
R9 FURY X Radeon R9 FURY X
vs
GTX 780 Ti GeForce GTX 780 Ti
R9 370X AMD Radeon R9 370X
vs
Tesla M10 Tesla M10
R9 370X AMD Radeon R9 370X
vs
CMP 90HX CMP 90HX
R9 370X AMD Radeon R9 370X
vs
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server PRO 6000 Blackwell Server
R9 FURY X AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
vs
7600 GT AGP GeForce 7600 GT AGP
R9 FURY X AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
vs
RX 550X 640SP RX 550X 640SP
R7 360 AMD Radeon R7 360
vs
ATI VE Radeon VE
R7 360 AMD Radeon R7 360
vs
HD 8950M HD 8950M
R7 360 AMD Radeon R7 360
vs
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
R7 360 AMD Radeon R7 360
vs
GTX 1650 GDDR6 GTX 1650 GDDR6
R7 360 AMD Radeon R7 360
vs
6600 AGP GeForce 6600 AGP

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 91 votes

Rate Radeon R9 FURY X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 190 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 FURY X or Arc A370M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.