Arc A370M vs Radeon R9 FURY X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated444
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.91
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameCapsaicinDG2-128
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data30 March 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961024
Core clock speed1050 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Number of transistors8,900 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rate268.899.20
Floating-point processing powerno data3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs25664
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L1 Cacheno data1.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBMGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MBps1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 1.4a, 3x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.2.1701.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm

Arc A370M has a 367% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 FURY X2 and Arc A370M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 FURY X2 is a desktop graphics card while Arc A370M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 10 votes

Rate Radeon R9 FURY X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 190 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 FURY X2 or Arc A370M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.