Radeon 740M vs R9 390X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 390X with Radeon 740M, including specs and performance data.

R9 390X
2015
0 MB GDDR5, 275 Watt
24.44
+173%

R9 390X outperforms Radeon 740M by a whopping 173% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking206453
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.62no data
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)RDNA 3
GPU code nameGrenada XTPhoenix
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date16 June 2015 (9 years ago)23 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$429 no data
Current price$19.99 (0x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816256
Core clock speedno data1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt30 Watt (30 - 15 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate184.840.00
Floating-point performance5,914 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 390X and Radeon 740M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pinNone
Bridgeless CrossFire1no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
High bandwidth memory (HBM)-no data
Maximum RAM amount0 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width512 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1050 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth384 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Eyefinity+no data
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D-no data
PowerTune+no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore-no data
VCE+no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan+1.3
Mantle+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 390X 24.44
+173%
Radeon 740M 8.96

R9 390X outperforms 740M by 173% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 390X 9439
+173%
Radeon 740M 3461

R9 390X outperforms 740M by 173% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD86
+187%
30−35
−187%
4K47
+194%
16−18
−194%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+163%
18−20
−163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+169%
12−14
−169%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+168%
27−30
−168%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+150%
18−20
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+162%
21−24
−162%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+160%
24−27
−160%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+173%
40−45
−173%
Hitman 3 45−50
+165%
16−18
−165%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
+156%
35−40
−156%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+159%
27−30
−159%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+160%
24−27
−160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+168%
27−30
−168%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+173%
30−35
−173%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+163%
18−20
−163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+169%
12−14
−169%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+168%
27−30
−168%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+150%
18−20
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+162%
21−24
−162%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+160%
24−27
−160%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+173%
40−45
−173%
Hitman 3 45−50
+165%
16−18
−165%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
+156%
35−40
−156%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+159%
27−30
−159%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+160%
24−27
−160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+168%
27−30
−168%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+163%
18−20
−163%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+173%
30−35
−173%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+163%
18−20
−163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+169%
12−14
−169%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+150%
18−20
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+162%
21−24
−162%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+173%
40−45
−173%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
+156%
35−40
−156%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+168%
27−30
−168%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+163%
18−20
−163%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+173%
30−35
−173%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+160%
24−27
−160%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+150%
18−20
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+173%
10−12
−173%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+150%
16−18
−150%
Hitman 3 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+163%
18−20
−163%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+167%
14−16
−167%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Hitman 3 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+173%
10−12
−173%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%

This is how R9 390X and Radeon 740M compete in popular games:

  • R9 390X is 187% faster in 1080p
  • R9 390X is 194% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.44 8.96
Recency 16 June 2015 23 May 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 30 Watt

The Radeon R9 390X is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 740M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 390X is a desktop card while Radeon 740M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 390X
Radeon R9 390X
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 242 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 34 votes

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.