FirePro W4300 vs Radeon R9 370

Place in performance ranking	374	499
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.78	4.71
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code name	Trinidad	Bonaire
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	5 May 2015 (9 years ago)	1 December 2015 (8 years ago)
Current price	$325	$129

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro W4300 has 165% better value for money than R9 370.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	768
Core clock speed	925 MHz	930 MHz
Boost clock speed	975 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	2,800 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	78.00	44.64
Floating-point performance	2,496 gflops	1,428 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	221 mm	171 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5600 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	4x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 370 12.21
+63%

FirePro W4300 7.49

Radeon R9 370 outperforms FirePro W4300 by 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 370 4722
+63.2%

FirePro W4300 2894

Radeon R9 370 outperforms FirePro W4300 by 63% in Passmark.