FirePro M6100 vs Radeon R9 290X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

R9 290X
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
19.23
+250%

Radeon R9 290X outperforms FirePro M6100 by a whopping 250% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking272572
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.112.75
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code nameHawaii XTBonaire
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date24 October 2013 (10 years ago)1 October 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 no data
Current price$20 (0x MSRP)$120

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R9 290X has 268% better value for money than FirePro M6100.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2816768
Core clock speedno data1100 MHz
Boost clock speed947 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,200 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate176.051.60
Floating-point performance5,632 gflops1,651 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 290X and FirePro M6100 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s88 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune-no data
TressFX1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore-no data
UVD+no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_0)
Shader Model6.36.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
Mantle-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 290X 19.23
+250%
FirePro M6100 5.49

Radeon R9 290X outperforms FirePro M6100 by 250% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 290X 7425
+250%
FirePro M6100 2122

Radeon R9 290X outperforms FirePro M6100 by 250% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R9 290X 16168
+201%
FirePro M6100 5369

Radeon R9 290X outperforms FirePro M6100 by 201% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R9 290X 37284
+87.6%
FirePro M6100 19876

Radeon R9 290X outperforms FirePro M6100 by 88% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 290X 11717
+205%
FirePro M6100 3837

Radeon R9 290X outperforms FirePro M6100 by 205% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 290X 73987
+192%
FirePro M6100 25342

Radeon R9 290X outperforms FirePro M6100 by 192% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

R9 290X 140
+149%
FirePro M6100 56

Radeon R9 290X outperforms FirePro M6100 by 149% in Unigine Heaven 3.0.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD91
+51.7%
60
−51.7%
4K54
+286%
14−16
−286%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35 no data
Battlefield 5 60−65 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 4 85−90 no data
Hitman 3 35−40 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80 no data
Metro Exodus 60−65 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35 no data
Battlefield 5 60−65 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 4 85−90 no data
Hitman 3 35−40 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80 no data
Metro Exodus 60−65 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 85−90 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 no data
Far Cry 5 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Hitman 3 21−24 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16 no data
Hitman 3 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Far Cry 5 10−11 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 18−20 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 no data

This is how R9 290X and FirePro M6100 compete in popular games:

  • R9 290X is 52% faster in 1080p
  • R9 290X is 286% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.23 5.49
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB

The Radeon R9 290X is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M6100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 290X is a desktop card while FirePro M6100 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 290X
Radeon R9 290X
AMD FirePro M6100
FirePro M6100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 432 votes

Rate Radeon R9 290X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 139 votes

Rate FirePro M6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.