GeForce MX450 vs Radeon R9 270X

Place in the ranking	396	461
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.86	no data
Power efficiency	4.86	26.88
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Curacao	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Design	reference	no data
Release date	8 October 2013 (11 years ago)	1 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	896
Core clock speed	no data	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz	1575 MHz
Number of transistors	2,800 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	180 Watt	25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	84.00	100.8
Floating-point processing power	2.688 TFLOPS	3.226 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x4
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2 x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5, GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	64.03 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
Eyefinity	+	-
HDMI	+	-
DisplayPort support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	-
CrossFire	+	-
FreeSync	+	-
HD3D	+	-
LiquidVR	+	-
TressFX	+	-
TrueAudio	+	-
UVD	+	-
DDMA audio	+	no data
Optimus	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 270X 12.68
+30.2%

GeForce MX450 9.74

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 270X 4876
+30.2%

GeForce MX450 3746

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 270X 6560
+38.8%

GeForce MX450 4725

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	35−40 +20.7%	29 −20.7%
1440p	21−24 +23.5%	17 −23.5%
4K	30−35 +15.4%	26 −15.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	5.69	no data
1440p	9.48	no data
4K	6.63	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +27.8%	18−20 −27.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −28%	32 +28%
Elden Ring	35−40 +31%	29 −31%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +28.1%	30−35 −28.1%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +27.8%	18−20 −27.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +38.9%	18 −38.9%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +2%	50 −2%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +2.9%	34 −2.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −40.6%	45 +40.6%
Valorant	50−55 +38.9%	35−40 −38.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +28.1%	30−35 −28.1%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +188%	8 −188%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +127%	11 −127%
Dota 2	45−50 −17.4%	54 +17.4%
Elden Ring	35−40 +35.7%	28 −35.7%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −18.4%	58 +18.4%
Fortnite	70−75 +26.3%	55−60 −26.3%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +27.5%	40 −27.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	45−50 +18.4%	38 −18.4%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +119%	16 −119%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	90−95 +23.7%	75−80 −23.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +540%	5 −540%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +31%	27−30 −31%
Valorant	50−55 +127%	22 −127%
World of Tanks	170−180 +22%	140−150 −22%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +28.1%	30−35 −28.1%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +27.8%	18−20 −27.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +317%	6 −317%
Dota 2	45−50 −76.1%	81 +76.1%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +22.5%	40−45 −22.5%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +70%	30 −70%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	90−95 +23.7%	75−80 −23.7%
Valorant	50−55 +38.9%	35−40 −38.9%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +54.5%	11 −54.5%
Elden Ring	18−20 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 +63.6%	11 −63.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	85−90 +80.9%	45−50 −80.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
World of Tanks	90−95 +28.6%	70−75 −28.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +31.6%	18−20 −31.6%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +66.7%	18 −66.7%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Valorant	30−35 +29.2%	24−27 −29.2%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Dota 2	21−24 +15%	20−22 −15%
Elden Ring	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 +15%	20−22 −15%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +32.1%	27−30 −32.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +15%	20−22 −15%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Dota 2	21−24 −39.1%	32 +39.1%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Fortnite	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%
Valorant	12−14 +30%	10−11 −30%

This is how R9 270X and GeForce MX450 compete in popular games:

R9 270X is 21% faster in 1080p
R9 270X is 24% faster in 1440p
R9 270X is 15% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 270X is 540% faster.
in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX450 is 76% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

R9 270X is ahead in 57 tests (90%)
GeForce MX450 is ahead in 6 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	12.68	9.74
Recency	8 October 2013	1 August 2020
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	180 Watt	25 Watt