ATI FirePro M5800 vs Radeon R7 M440

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M440 with FirePro M5800, including specs and performance data.

R7 M440
2016
4 GB DDR3
2.25
+63%

R7 M440 outperforms ATI M5800 by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8521002
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.80
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameMesoMadison
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 May 2016 (8 years ago)1 March 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320400
Core clock speed891 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown26 Watt
Texture fill rate17.8213.00
Floating-point processing power0.5702 TFLOPS0.52 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2020

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s51.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.05.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 M440 2.25
+63%
ATI M5800 1.38

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R7 M440 5584
+48.5%
ATI M5800 3760

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−61.5%
21
+61.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Dota 2 12
+500%
2−3
−500%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Fortnite 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 6
+200%
2−3
−200%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Valorant 0−1 0−1
World of Tanks 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Dota 2 21
+950%
2−3
−950%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
World of Tanks 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Fortnite 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Valorant 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

This is how R7 M440 and ATI M5800 compete in popular games:

  • ATI M5800 is 62% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R7 M440 is 950% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R7 M440 is ahead in 39 tests (87%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (13%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.25 1.38
Recency 15 May 2016 1 March 2010
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

R7 M440 has a 63% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R7 M440 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M5800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M440 is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M5800 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M440
Radeon R7 M440
ATI FirePro M5800
FirePro M5800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 289 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 9 votes

Rate FirePro M5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.