Radeon R5 M315 vs ATI FirePro M5800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M2000 M3900 M5950 M8900 M5800 M7820
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
R5 M315 R7 A360 R7 M340 R7 M350 R7 M360 R7 M440 R7 M445 R7 M460 R8 M365DX R8 M445DX R8 M535DX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro M5800 with Radeon R5 M315, including specs and performance data.

ATI M5800
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 26 Watt
1.27
+9.5%

M5800 outperforms R5 M315 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
ATI M5800 FirePro M5800
R5 M315 R5 M315

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10681101
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.78no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameMadisonMeso
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date1 March 2010 (15 years ago)5 May 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores400384
Compute unitsno data5
Core clock speed650 MHz970 MHz
Number of transistors627 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)26 Wattno data
Texture fill rate13.0023.28
Floating-point processing power0.52 TFLOPS0.745 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2024
L1 Cache40 KB96 KB
L2 Cache256 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)DirectX® 12
Shader Model5.06.0
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCL1.2Not Listed
VulkanN/A-
Mantle-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+3%
30−35
−3%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
+7.1%
27−30
−7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+3%
30−35
−3%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+3%
30−35
−3%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Valorant 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how ATI M5800 and R5 M315 compete in popular games:

  • ATI M5800 is 17% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the ATI M5800 is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI M5800 performs better in 18 tests (39%)
  • there's a draw in 28 tests (61%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.27 1.16
Recency 1 March 2010 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

ATI M5800 has a 9.5% higher aggregate performance score.

R5 M315, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between FirePro M5800 and Radeon R5 M315.

Be aware that FirePro M5800 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon R5 M315 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

ATI FirePro M5800
FirePro M5800
AMD Radeon R5 M315
Radeon R5 M315
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

ATI M5800 FirePro M5800
vs
FX 3800M Quadro FX 3800M
R5 M315 Radeon R5 M315
vs
GT 625M GeForce GT 625M
ATI M5800 FirePro M5800
vs
NVS 5200M NVS 5200M
HD 6650M HD 6650M
vs
FX 5600 XT FX 5600 XT
HD 6650M HD 6650M
vs
HD 8310E HD 8310E
HD 6650M HD 6650M
vs
HD 8330 Mobile IGP HD 8330 Mobile IGP
HD 6650M HD 6650M
vs
RX 6500 XT RX 6500 XT
ATI M5800 M5800
vs
R5 M230 R5 M230
ATI M5800 M5800
vs
R5 M435 R5 M435
ATI M5800 M5800
vs
R5 M230 Rebrand R5 M230 Rebrand
ATI M5800 M5800
vs
R5 M240 Rebrand R5 M240 Rebrand
ATI M5800 M5800
vs
UHD Graphics G4 UHD Graphics G4
HD 6680G2 HD 6680G2
vs
FX 5600 XT FX 5600 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 9 votes

Rate FirePro M5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 9 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M315 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro M5800 or Radeon R5 M315, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.