UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs Radeon R7 M365X

Place in the ranking	891	759
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	8.67
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	Litho	Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	5 May 2015 (9 years ago)	28 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	32
Compute units	6	no data
Core clock speed	900 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	825 MHz	1100 MHz
Number of transistors	690 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate	23.04	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.7373 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	8	no data
TMUs	24	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	no data
Eyefinity	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
HD3D	+	-
PowerTune	+	-
DualGraphics	+	-
ZeroCore	+	-
Switchable graphics	+	-
Quick Sync	no data	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12_1
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.4	no data
OpenCL	Not Listed	no data
Mantle	+	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	8−9 −62.5%	13 +62.5%
4K	5−6 −80%	9 +80%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	3 +0%	3 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	12 +0%	12 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Metro Exodus	8 +0%	8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6 +0%	6 +0%
Valorant	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Dota 2	12 +0%	12 +0%
Far Cry 5	13 +0%	13 +0%
Fortnite	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	11 +0%	11 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	7 +0%	7 +0%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	32 +0%	32 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Valorant	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
World of Tanks	30 +0%	30 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Dota 2	20 +0%	20 +0%
Far Cry 5	12 +0%	12 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	13 +0%	13 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Valorant	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
World of Tanks	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Valorant	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	9 +0%	9 +0%
Far Cry 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Fortnite	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Valorant	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

This is how R7 M365X and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 63% faster in 1080p
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 80% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 61 test (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.90	2.94
Recency	5 May 2015	28 May 2019
Chip lithography	28 nm	10 nm

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) has a 54.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M365X in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.