UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) vs Radeon R7 M365X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M340 M350 M350 2GB M360 M365X M370 M380
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
G1 G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) G1 32EU Mobile G4 G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) G4 48EU Mobile G7 G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) G7 64EU Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 M365X and UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R7 M365X
2015
4 GB GDDR5
1.96

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) outperforms R7 M365X by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R7 M365X R7 M365X
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking918877
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data25.38
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameLithoLakefield GT2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 May 2015 (10 years ago)28 May 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38464
Compute units6no data
Core clock speed900 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed825 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors690 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data7 Watt
Texture fill rate23.04no data
Floating-point processing power0.7373 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth64 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCLNot Listedno data
Mantle+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−30%
13
+30%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
God of War 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
God of War 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 15
+0%
15
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
God of War 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 15
+0%
15
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
God of War 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
God of War 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
God of War 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how R7 M365X and UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is 30% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 57 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.96 2.33
Recency 5 May 2015 28 May 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) has a 18.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M365X in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R7 M365X
Radeon R7 M365X
Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 M365X Radeon R7 M365X
vs
GT 445M GeForce GT 445M
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
vs
HD Graphics 530 HD Graphics 530
R7 M365X Radeon R7 M365X
vs
GeForce 920A GeForce 920A
9800 GT GeForce 9800 GT
vs
TITAN V V
GTX 1630 NVIDIA GTX 1630
vs
TITAN V V
RX 6750 XT AMD RX 6750 XT
vs
Tesla P100 SXM2 P100 SXM2
RTX 3070 Ti NVIDIA RTX 3070 Ti
vs
UHD Graphics 600 600
RTX 3060 Mobile NVIDIA RTX 3060 Mobile
vs
UHD Graphics 600 600
GT 720 NVIDIA GT 720
vs
R7 350 350
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
vs
Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB V100 PCIe 16 GB
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
vs
Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB V100 PCIe 32 GB
UHD Graphics 64EU Intel Graphics 64EU
vs
RX 560X 560X
Arc A580 Arc A580
vs
RX 560X 560X

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.8 55 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M365X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 16 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M365X or UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.