GeForce GTS 350M vs Radeon R7 350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
HD 7730 HD 7750 HD 7770 HD 8730 OEM HD 8740 OEM HD 8760 OEM R7 250E R7 250X R7 350 R7 350 640SP R7 450 OEM R9 255 OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
310M 315M 320M G105M G210M GT 230M GT 240M GT 330M GT 335M GTS 350M GTS 360M ION 2

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 350 with GeForce GTS 350M, including specs and performance data.

R7 350
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
5.06
+462%

R7 350 outperforms GTS 350M by a whopping 462% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R7 350 R7 350
GTS 350M GTS 350M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6671177
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.162.50
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameCape VerdeGT215
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 July 2016 (9 years ago)7 January 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51296
Core clock speed800 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million727 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate25.6016.00
Floating-point processing power0.8192 TFLOPS0.24 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data360
ROPs168
TMUs3232
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-II
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options-+
MXM Typeno dataMXM 3.0 Type-B

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHzUp to 2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s51.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortDisplayPortLVDSHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGA
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 40 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 5.06 0.90
Recency 6 July 2016 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 28 Watt

R7 350 has a 462.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GTS 350M, on the other hand, has 96.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R7 350 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 350M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 350 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTS 350M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R7 350
Radeon R7 350
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
GeForce GTS 350M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
Radeon 550 Radeon 550
GTS 350M GeForce GTS 350M
vs
8800M GTS GeForce 8800M GTS
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
HD 7770 Radeon HD 7770
R7 M365X Radeon R7 M365X
vs
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
R7 A360 Radeon R7 A360
vs
RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB
P102-100 P102 100
vs
GTX 1660 GTX 1660
P102-100 P102 100
vs
RX 6700M RX 6700M
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
HD Graphics 2000 Graphics 2000
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
HD 8740 OEM HD 8740 OEM
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
RTX 5090 Mobile RTX 5090 Mobile
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
H200 NVL H200 NVL
RX 580 OEM Radeon RX 580 OEM
vs
RTX A5500 RTX A5500
RX 580 OEM Radeon RX 580 OEM
vs
RTX 5090 RTX 5090

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 559 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 7 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 350 or GeForce GTS 350M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.