Radeon RX 7900M vs R7 370

Place in the ranking	404	38
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	6.43	no data
Power efficiency	7.35	22.45
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Trinidad	Navi 31
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Design	reference	no data
Release date	18 June 2015 (9 years ago)	19 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	4608
Core clock speed	no data	1825 MHz
Boost clock speed	975 MHz	2090 MHz
Number of transistors	2,800 million	57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	180 Watt
Texture fill rate	62.40	601.9
Floating-point processing power	1.997 TFLOPS	38.52 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	192
TMUs	64	288
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	152 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	975 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	Portable Device Dependent
Eyefinity	+	-
Number of Eyefinity displays	6	no data
HDMI	+	-
DisplayPort support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	-
CrossFire	+	-
FreeSync	+	-
TrueAudio	+	-
VCE	+	-
DDMA audio	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.2
Vulkan	+	1.3
Mantle	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 370 11.68

RX 7900M 58.35
+400%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 370 4508

RX 7900M 22519
+400%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R7 370 8519

RX 7900M 59943
+604%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 370 5961

RX 7900M 50241
+743%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	46 −248%	160 +248%
1440p	53 −121%	117 +121%
4K	19 −316%	79 +316%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.24	no data
1440p	2.81	no data
4K	7.84	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20

−372%

85−90
+372%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −341%	110−120 +341%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −456%	100−105 +456%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −392%	180−190 +392%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −350%	100−110 +350%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −372%	85−90 +372%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −304%	100−110 +304%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −331%	130−140 +331%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −187%	220−230 +187%
Hitman 3	21−24 −436%	110−120 +436%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −252%	210−220 +252%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −303%	150−160 +303%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −256%	110−120 +256%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −503%	220−230 +503%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −116%	140−150 +116%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −341%	110−120 +341%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −456%	100−105 +456%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −392%	180−190 +392%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −350%	100−110 +350%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −372%	85−90 +372%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −304%	100−110 +304%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −331%	130−140 +331%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −187%	220−230 +187%
Hitman 3	21−24 −436%	110−120 +436%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −252%	210−220 +252%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −303%	150−160 +303%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −256%	110−120 +256%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −503%	220−230 +503%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	89 −33.7%	110−120 +33.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −116%	140−150 +116%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −341%	110−120 +341%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −456%	100−105 +456%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −350%	100−110 +350%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −372%	85−90 +372%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −304%	100−110 +304%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −187%	220−230 +187%
Hitman 3	21−24 −436%	110−120 +436%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −252%	210−220 +252%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −805%	344 +805%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	22 −664%	168 +664%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −116%	140−150 +116%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

−256%

110−120
+256%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −435%	120−130 +435%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −394%	85−90 +394%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −442%	65−70 +442%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −763%	65−70 +763%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −467%	65−70 +467%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −415%	65−70 +415%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −382%	270−280 +382%
Hitman 3	14−16 −440%	80−85 +440%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −467%	130−140 +467%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −426%	100−105 +426%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −1283%	249 +1283%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −700%	95−100 +700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 −214%	220−230 +214%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−416%

95−100
+416%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −482%	60−65 +482%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −575%	50−55 +575%
Hitman 3	8−9 −500%	45−50 +500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −304%	210−220 +304%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −730%	80−85 +730%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −1060%	116 +1060%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −529%	40−45 +529%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −740%	40−45 +740%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −583%	40−45 +583%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −533%	35−40 +533%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −487%	85−90 +487%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −1356%	131 +1356%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −725%	30−35 +725%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

−409%

55−60
+409%

This is how R7 370 and RX 7900M compete in popular games:

RX 7900M is 248% faster in 1080p
RX 7900M is 121% faster in 1440p
RX 7900M is 316% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7900M is 1356% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 7900M surpassed R7 370 in all 66 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.68	58.35
Recency	18 June 2015	19 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	180 Watt

R7 370 has 63.6% lower power consumption.

RX 7900M, on the other hand, has a 399.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 370 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 370 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 7900M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.