Radeon RX 7700S vs R7 370

Place in performance ranking	380	92
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.41	no data
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	RDNA 3
GPU code name	Trinidad (Pitcairn)	Navi 33
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Design	reference	no data
Release date	5 May 2015 (9 years ago)	5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	no data
Current price	$378 (2.5x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	2048
Boost clock speed	975 MHz	2200 MHz
Number of transistors	2,800 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	100 Watt (75 - 100 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	62.40	300.8
Floating-point performance	1,997 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 370 and Radeon RX 7700S compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	152 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	975 MHz	18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	Portable Device Dependent
Eyefinity	+	no data
Number of Eyefinity displays	6	no data
HDMI	+	no data
DisplayPort support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	no data
CrossFire	1	no data
Enduro	-	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
HD3D	-	no data
PowerTune	-	no data
TrueAudio	+	no data
ZeroCore	-	no data
VCE	+	no data
DDMA audio	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	+	1.3
Mantle	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 370 11.70

RX 7700S 40.46
+246%

RX 7700S outperforms R7 370 by 246% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R7 370 4520

RX 7700S 15627
+246%

RX 7700S outperforms R7 370 by 246% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R7 370 8519

RX 7700S 37918
+345%

RX 7700S outperforms R7 370 by 345% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R7 370 5961

RX 7700S 24246
+307%

RX 7700S outperforms R7 370 by 307% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	49 −137%	116 +137%
1440p	44 −38.6%	61 +38.6%
4K	21 −95.2%	41 +95.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20

−294%

70−75
+294%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −192%	70−75 +192%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −289%	70−75 +289%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −251%	130−140 +251%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −242%	80−85 +242%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −294%	70−75 +294%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −222%	85−90 +222%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −213%	100−105 +213%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −171%	150−160 +171%
Hitman 3	21−24 −277%	80−85 +277%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −242%	160−170 +242%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −200%	110−120 +200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −191%	95−100 +191%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −461%	202 +461%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −145%	95−100 +145%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −192%	70−75 +192%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −289%	70−75 +289%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −251%	130−140 +251%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −242%	80−85 +242%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −294%	70−75 +294%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −222%	85−90 +222%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −213%	100−105 +213%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −171%	150−160 +171%
Hitman 3	21−24 −277%	80−85 +277%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −242%	160−170 +242%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −200%	110−120 +200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −191%	95−100 +191%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −364%	167 +364%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35 −320%	147 +320%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −145%	95−100 +145%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −192%	70−75 +192%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −289%	70−75 +289%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −242%	80−85 +242%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −294%	70−75 +294%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −222%	85−90 +222%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −171%	150−160 +171%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −242%	160−170 +242%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −300%	144 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	22 −282%	84 +282%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −145%	95−100 +145%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

−191%

95−100
+191%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −239%	75−80 +239%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 −370%	90−95 +370%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −267%	40−45 +267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −463%	45−50 +463%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −343%	60−65 +343%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −450%	30−35 +450%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −326%	81 +326%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −286%	85−90 +286%
Hitman 3	14−16 −253%	50−55 +253%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −267%	85−90 +267%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −295%	75−80 +295%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −411%	92 +411%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −392%	55−60 +392%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −414%	35−40 +414%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−268%

70−75
+268%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −273%	40−45 +273%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −325%	30−35 +325%
Hitman 3	8−9 −313%	30−35 +313%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −333%	50−55 +333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −433%	30−35 +433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −330%	43 +330%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −300%	27−30 +300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −420%	24−27 +420%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −333%	24−27 +333%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −600%	14−16 +600%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −300%	24−27 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −273%	55−60 +273%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −333%	50−55 +333%
Metro Exodus	10−12 −282%	40−45 +282%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

−227%

35−40
+227%

This is how R7 370 and RX 7700S compete in popular games:

RX 7700S is 137% faster in 1080p
RX 7700S is 39% faster in 1440p
RX 7700S is 95% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7700S is 600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 7700S surpassed R7 370 in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.70	40.46
Recency	5 May 2015	5 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	100 Watt