Radeon 780M vs R7 360

Place in performance ranking	484	283
Place by popularity	not in top-100	57
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.57	no data
Architecture	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)	RDNA 3
GPU code name	Tobago	Phoenix
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Design	reference	no data
Release date	18 June 2015 (9 years ago)	5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$109	no data
Current price	$13.98 (0.1x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	768
Core clock speed	no data	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz	3000 MHz
Number of transistors	2,080 million	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	54 Watt (35 - 54 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	50.40	139.2
Floating-point performance	1,613 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 360 and Radeon 780M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	165 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin	None
Bridgeless CrossFire	1	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	Portable Device Dependent
Eyefinity	1	no data
Number of Eyefinity displays	6	no data
HDMI	+	no data
DisplayPort support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	no data
CrossFire	1	no data
Enduro	-	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
HD3D	-	no data
PowerTune	+	no data
TrueAudio	+	no data
ZeroCore	-	no data
VCE	+	no data
DDMA audio	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.3	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	+	1.3
Mantle	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 360 8.01

Radeon 780M 18.35
+129%

780M outperforms R7 360 by 129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R7 360 3093

Radeon 780M 7086
+129%

780M outperforms R7 360 by 129% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R7 360 4110

Radeon 780M 7935
+93.1%

780M outperforms R7 360 by 93% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	14−16 −157%	36 +157%
1440p	9−10 −133%	21 +133%
4K	6−7 −133%	14 +133%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

−144%

39
+144%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −157%	35−40 +157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −158%	30−35 +158%
Battlefield 5	24−27 −150%	60−65 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −131%	35−40 +131%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −158%	31 +158%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −139%	40−45 +139%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −133%	45−50 +133%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −140%	80−85 +140%
Hitman 3	14−16 −157%	35−40 +157%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −143%	97 +143%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −154%	60−65 +154%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −143%	50−55 +143%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −137%	64 +137%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −156%	41 +156%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −157%	35−40 +157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −158%	30−35 +158%
Battlefield 5	24−27 −150%	60−65 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −131%	35−40 +131%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −140%	24 +140%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −139%	40−45 +139%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −133%	45−50 +133%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −140%	80−85 +140%
Hitman 3	14−16 −157%	35−40 +157%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −143%	70−75 +143%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −133%	21 +133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −143%	50−55 +143%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −152%	53 +152%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −156%	46 +156%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −133%	55−60 +133%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −157%	35−40 +157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −158%	30−35 +158%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −131%	35−40 +131%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −130%	23 +130%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −139%	40−45 +139%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −140%	80−85 +140%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −152%	53 +152%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −156%	46 +156%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −142%	29 +142%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −157%	18 +157%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−143%

50−55
+143%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −157%	35−40 +157%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −138%	18−20 +138%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −130%	21−24 +130%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −170%	27 +170%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −157%	35−40 +157%
Hitman 3	9−10 −144%	21−24 +144%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −131%	35−40 +131%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −143%	30−35 +143%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −167%	32 +167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −150%	20 +150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−150%

30−33
+150%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
Hitman 3	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −150%	20−22 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −150%	15 +150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −175%	10−12 +175%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −200%	9−10 +200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −150%	24−27 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −150%	20−22 +150%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −143%	16−18 +143%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%