GeForce G102M vs Radeon R7 265

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 265 with GeForce G102M, including specs and performance data.

R7 265
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
10.42
+2323%

R7 265 outperforms G102M by a whopping 2323% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4381247
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.28no data
Power efficiency4.772.11
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code namePitcairnC79
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date13 February 2014 (10 years ago)8 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102416
Core clock speedno data450 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,800 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate59.203.600
Floating-point processing power1.894 TFLOPS0.0352 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data48
ROPs324
TMUs648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0PCI-E 1.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GBUp to 512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortVGAHDMIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDS
Multi monitor supportno data+
Eyefinity+-
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
DDMA audio+no data
Power managementno data8.0

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1211.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.42 0.43
Recency 13 February 2014 8 January 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 14 Watt

R7 265 has a 2323.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce G102M, on the other hand, has 971.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R7 265 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G102M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 265 is a desktop card while GeForce G102M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 265
Radeon R7 265
NVIDIA GeForce G102M
GeForce G102M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 373 votes

Rate Radeon R7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 40 votes

Rate GeForce G102M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.