GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Radeon R7 260X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 260X with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R7 260X
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 115 Watt
8.25

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms R7 260X by a whopping 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking477257
Place by popularitynot in top-10080
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.2818.35
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameBonaireN18P-G62
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (10 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139 no data
Current price$204 (1.5x MSRP)$892

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has 1334% better value for money than R7 260X.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8961024
Core clock speedno data1350 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1485 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt50 Watt (50 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate61.6095.04
Floating-point performance1,971 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 260X and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth104 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity1no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support-no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D-no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore-no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkanno data1.2.140
Mantle-no data
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 260X 8.25
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.19
+145%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R7 260X by 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R7 260X 3186
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+145%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R7 260X by 145% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R7 260X 4380
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 9930
+127%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R7 260X by 127% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−176%
58
+176%
1440p18−20
−161%
47
+161%
4K9−10
−156%
23
+156%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 59
−137%
140−150
+137%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 61
−130%
140−150
+130%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 49
−124%
110−120
+124%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−142%
160−170
+142%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 53
−126%
120−130
+126%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
−139%
110−120
+139%
Far Cry 5 69
−132%
160−170
+132%
Far Cry New Dawn 84
−138%
200−210
+138%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−142%
220−230
+142%
Hitman 3 51
−135%
120−130
+135%
Horizon Zero Dawn 115
−143%
280−290
+143%
Metro Exodus 91
−142%
220−230
+142%
Red Dead Redemption 2 44
−127%
100−105
+127%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95
−142%
230−240
+142%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60
−133%
140−150
+133%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 46
−139%
110−120
+139%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
−134%
75−80
+134%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−142%
160−170
+142%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
−134%
110−120
+134%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
−136%
85−90
+136%
Far Cry 5 58
−141%
140−150
+141%
Far Cry New Dawn 59
−137%
140−150
+137%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−142%
220−230
+142%
Hitman 3 45
−144%
110−120
+144%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180
−122%
400−450
+122%
Metro Exodus 68
−135%
160−170
+135%
Red Dead Redemption 2 42
−138%
100−105
+138%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75
−140%
180−190
+140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
−136%
170−180
+136%
Watch Dogs: Legion 183
−119%
400−450
+119%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27
−141%
65−70
+141%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 15
−133%
35−40
+133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 31
−142%
75−80
+142%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
−135%
80−85
+135%
Far Cry 5 39
−144%
95−100
+144%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−142%
220−230
+142%
Horizon Zero Dawn 64
−134%
150−160
+134%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 63
−138%
150−160
+138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
−144%
95−100
+144%
Watch Dogs: Legion 22
−127%
50−55
+127%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 41
−144%
100−105
+144%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−144%
95−100
+144%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−138%
95−100
+138%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−138%
50−55
+138%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−131%
60−65
+131%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
−119%
35−40
+119%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−135%
80−85
+135%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−144%
95−100
+144%
Hitman 3 28
−132%
65−70
+132%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−144%
100−105
+144%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−137%
90−95
+137%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−138%
100−105
+138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−142%
80−85
+142%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−125%
45−50
+125%
Far Cry New Dawn 20
−125%
45−50
+125%
Hitman 3 16
−119%
35−40
+119%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−127%
50−55
+127%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
−122%
40−45
+122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
−140%
60−65
+140%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−125%
27−30
+125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−140%
24−27
+140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
−133%
14−16
+133%
Far Cry 5 12
−125%
27−30
+125%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−132%
65−70
+132%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−127%
50−55
+127%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−122%
40−45
+122%

This is how R7 260X and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 176% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 161% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 156% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.25 20.19
Recency 8 October 2013 2 April 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 50 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 260X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 260X is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 260X
Radeon R7 260X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 376 votes

Rate Radeon R7 260X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1472 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.