AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

Price now 119$
Games supported 70%
AMD Radeon R7 260X
Radeon R7 260X
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 0
  • Max video memory 4096 MB
  • Memory type GDDR5
  • Memory clock speed 0
  • Maximum resolution
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
  • Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed 1674 MHz (3348 data rate)
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 9.99$
Games supported 70%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating381379
Value for money6.468.13
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameBonaireGF100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (8 years ago)12 April 2010 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139 $349
Price now$119 (0.9x MSRP)$9.99 (0x MSRP)
Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896no data
CUDA coresno data448
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,080 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)115 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate61.6034.0 billion/sec
Floating-point performance1,971 gflops1,088.6 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.016x PCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length170 mm9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data
SLI optionsno data+


Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1674 MHz (3348 data rate)
Memory bandwidth104 GB/s133.9 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortTwo Dual Link DVIMini HDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
Eyefinity1no data
HDMI+no data
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
DisplayPort support-no data
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal


Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D-no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore-no data
DDMA audio+no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkanno dataN/A
Mantle-no data
CUDAno data+

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 260X 10.59
GTX 470 10.60
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • Passmark

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R7 260X 4380
GTX 470 2758

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 260X 3147
GTX 470 3151

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Radeon R7 260X and GeForce GTX 470. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 225 Mh/s 97 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 5.16 Mh/s no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900pno data52
Full HDno data64
1200pno data53

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance rating 10.59 10.60
Novelty 8 October 2013 12 April 2010
Cost $139 $349
Memory bus width 128 320
Memory bandwidth 104 133.9
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

Technical City couldn't decide between

AMD Radeon R7 260X
AMD Radeon R7 260X


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470

The differences in performance seem too small.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Competitors of Radeon R7 260X by NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon R7 260X from NVIDIA is GeForce GTX 470, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 2 positions in our rating.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 GeForce GTX 470

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon R7 260X:

Competitors of GeForce GTX 470 by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 470 from AMD is Radeon R7 260X, which is nearly equal in speed and is lower by 2 positions in our rating.

AMD Radeon R7 260X Radeon R7 260X

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 470:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 100

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 125 ratings

Rate AMD Radeon R7 260X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 152 ratings

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.