Quadro P620 vs Radeon R6 (Mullins)
Aggregate performance score
Quadro P620 outperforms Radeon R6 (Mullins) by a whopping 1413% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 1158 | 439 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 20.70 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.1 (2014) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | Mullins | GP107 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 29 April 2014 (10 years ago) | 27 May 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Current price | no data | $170 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 1177 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1442 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 3,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 25 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 43.33 |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 1,490 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon R6 (Mullins) and Quadro P620 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 145 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 80.13 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | no data | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | no data | 6.1 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Quadro P620 outperforms Radeon R6 (Mullins) by 1413% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Quadro P620 outperforms Radeon R6 (Mullins) by 1247% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 8%
Quadro P620 outperforms Radeon R6 (Mullins) by 1412% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 3−4
−1633%
| 52
+1633%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−400%
|
14−16
+400%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−900%
|
20−22
+900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−400%
|
14−16
+400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−600%
|
27−30
+600%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−1000%
|
30−35
+1000%
|
| Hitman 3 | 3−4
−600%
|
21−24
+600%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−191%
|
30−35
+191%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8−9
−225%
|
24−27
+225%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−900%
|
20−22
+900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−400%
|
14−16
+400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−1500%
|
64
+1500%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−1000%
|
30−35
+1000%
|
| Hitman 3 | 3−4
−600%
|
21−24
+600%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−191%
|
30−35
+191%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8−9
+33.3%
|
6
−33.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−967%
|
32
+967%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−900%
|
20−22
+900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−400%
|
14−16
+400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−600%
|
27−30
+600%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−1000%
|
30−35
+1000%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−191%
|
30−35
+191%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−467%
|
17
+467%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
−175%
|
10−12
+175%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−1400%
|
14−16
+1400%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 3−4
−533%
|
18−20
+533%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−800%
|
9−10
+800%
|
4K
High Preset
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−340%
|
21−24
+340%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−350%
|
9−10
+350%
|
This is how R6 (Mullins) and Quadro P620 compete in popular games:
- Quadro P620 is 1633% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R6 (Mullins) is 33% faster.
- in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P620 is 1500% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- R6 (Mullins) is ahead in 1 test (3%)
- Quadro P620 is ahead in 31 test (97%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.62 | 9.38 |
| Recency | 29 April 2014 | 27 May 2019 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
The Quadro P620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R6 (Mullins) in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon R6 (Mullins) is a notebook card while Quadro P620 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
