GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R9 M380

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

R9 M380
2015
4096 MB GDDR5
7.13

GeForce GTX 750 Ti outperforms Radeon R9 M380 by 41% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking510410
Place by popularitynot in top-10021
Value for moneyno data1.07
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameStrato Pro GDDR5GM107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date16 June 2015 (8 years old)18 February 2014 (10 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149
Current priceno data$357 (2.4x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768640
CUDA coresno data640
Core clock speed1000 MHz1020 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1085 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data60 Watt
Texture fill rate48.0043.40
Floating-point performance1,536 gflops1,389 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 M380 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0PCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data5.7" (14.5 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz5.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s86.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMI
Multi monitor supportno data4 displays
Eyefinity1no data
HDMIno data+
HDCPno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
PowerTune+no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
Blu Ray 3Dno data+
3D Gamingno data+
3D Visionno data+
3D Vision Liveno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (11_0)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed1.2
Vulkanno data1.1.126
Mantle+no data
CUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M380 7.13
GTX 750 Ti 10.08
+41.4%

GeForce GTX 750 Ti outperforms Radeon R9 M380 by 41% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 M380 2762
GTX 750 Ti 3903
+41.3%

GeForce GTX 750 Ti outperforms Radeon R9 M380 by 41% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−42.9%
50
+42.9%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−47.8%
30−35
+47.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−47.1%
24−27
+47.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%
Hitman 3 16−18
−52.9%
24−27
+52.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−30.8%
16−18
+30.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−37.5%
21−24
+37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−47.8%
30−35
+47.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−47.1%
24−27
+47.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%
Hitman 3 16−18
−52.9%
24−27
+52.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−50%
14−16
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−30.8%
16−18
+30.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−37.5%
21−24
+37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−47.8%
30−35
+47.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−47.1%
24−27
+47.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−50%
27−30
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−50%
35−40
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%
Hitman 3 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Hitman 3 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

This is how R9 M380 and GTX 750 Ti compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 750 Ti is 42.9% faster than R9 M380

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 750 Ti is 300% faster than the R9 M380.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 750 Ti is ahead in 67 tests (99%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 7.13 10.08
Recency 16 June 2015 18 February 2014

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M380 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M380 is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M380
Radeon R9 M380
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 5725 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.