CMP 30HX vs Radeon R6 (Mullins)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R6 (Mullins) with CMP 30HX, including specs and performance data.

R6 (Mullins)
2014
0.59

CMP 30HX outperforms R6 (Mullins) by a whopping 2066% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1270430
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.42
Power efficiencyno data7.87
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameMullinsTU116
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date29 April 2014 (12 years ago)25 February 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1281408
Core clock speed500 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistorsno data6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data125 Watt
Texture fill rateno data157.1
Floating-point processing powerno data5.027 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data88
L1 Cacheno data1.4 MB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x4
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data336.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2025%
170−180
+2025%
Valorant 27−30
−2043%
600−650
+2043%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−1844%
350−400
+1844%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Dota 2 12−14
−1983%
250−260
+1983%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2025%
170−180
+2025%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Valorant 27−30
−2043%
600−650
+2043%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Dota 2 12−14
−1983%
250−260
+1983%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2025%
170−180
+2025%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Valorant 27−30
−2043%
600−650
+2043%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−2043%
300−310
+2043%
Valorant 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.59 12.78
Recency 29 April 2014 25 February 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

CMP 30HX has a 2066% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

The CMP 30HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R6 (Mullins) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R6 (Mullins) is a notebook graphics card while CMP 30HX is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R6 (Mullins) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 55 votes

Rate CMP 30HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R6 (Mullins) or CMP 30HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.