Quadro T1000 vs Radeon R6 (Mullins)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R6 (Mullins) with Quadro T1000, including specs and performance data.
T1000 outperforms R6 (Mullins) by a whopping 2532% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1268 | 379 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 23.88 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.1 (2014) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | Mullins | TU117 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 29 April 2014 (11 years ago) | 27 May 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 1395 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1455 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 50 Watt |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 8000 MHz |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−2500%
|
130−140
+2500%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−2500%
|
130−140
+2500%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−2500%
|
130−140
+2500%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−2525%
|
210−220
+2525%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−2400%
|
700−750
+2400%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 18−20
−2400%
|
450−500
+2400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
| Dota 2 | 12−14
−2400%
|
300−310
+2400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−2500%
|
130−140
+2500%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−2500%
|
130−140
+2500%
|
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−2525%
|
210−220
+2525%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−2500%
|
130−140
+2500%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−2400%
|
700−750
+2400%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
| Dota 2 | 12−14
−2400%
|
300−310
+2400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−2500%
|
130−140
+2500%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−2500%
|
130−140
+2500%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−2525%
|
210−220
+2525%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−2500%
|
130−140
+2500%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−2400%
|
700−750
+2400%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−2400%
|
75−80
+2400%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 3−4
−2400%
|
75−80
+2400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−2400%
|
150−160
+2400%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−2400%
|
350−400
+2400%
|
| Valorant | 3−4
−2400%
|
75−80
+2400%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.59 | 15.53 |
| Recency | 29 April 2014 | 27 May 2019 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Quadro T1000 has a 2532.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.
The Quadro T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R6 (Mullins) in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon R6 (Mullins) is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
