P104-100 vs Radeon R6 (Mullins)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R6 (Mullins) with P104-100, including specs and performance data.
P104-100 outperforms R6 (Mullins) by a whopping 1385% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1270 | 537 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.1 (2014) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
| GPU code name | Mullins | GP104 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 29 April 2014 (12 years ago) | 12 December 2017 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | 1920 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1733 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 7,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 208.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 6.655 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 64 |
| TMUs | no data | 120 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 720 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 2 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR5X |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1251 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 320.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | - | 6.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−1300%
|
70−75
+1300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−1275%
|
110−120
+1275%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−1329%
|
400−450
+1329%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 18−20
−1344%
|
260−270
+1344%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
| Dota 2 | 12−14
−1317%
|
170−180
+1317%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−1300%
|
70−75
+1300%
|
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−1275%
|
110−120
+1275%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−1300%
|
70−75
+1300%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−1329%
|
400−450
+1329%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
| Dota 2 | 12−14
−1317%
|
170−180
+1317%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−1300%
|
70−75
+1300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−1275%
|
110−120
+1275%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−1300%
|
70−75
+1300%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−1329%
|
400−450
+1329%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−1317%
|
85−90
+1317%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−1329%
|
200−210
+1329%
|
| Valorant | 3−4
−1233%
|
40−45
+1233%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.59 | 8.76 |
| Recency | 29 April 2014 | 12 December 2017 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 16 nm |
P104-100 has a 1385% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.
The P104-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R6 (Mullins) in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon R6 (Mullins) is a notebook graphics card while P104-100 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
