GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile vs Radeon R6 M340DX
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R6 M340DX and GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RTX 5050 Mobile outperforms R6 M340DX by a whopping 1461% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 833 | 102 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 62.47 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025) |
| GPU code name | Jet | GB207 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 12 December 2015 (9 years ago) | 24 June 2025 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 955 MHz | 2235 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 2520 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 690 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 24.72 | 201.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.791 TFLOPS | 12.9 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 32 |
| TMUs | 24 | 80 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 80 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 20 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 224.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.4 |
| CUDA | - | 12.0 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 10
−1400%
| 150−160
+1400%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−3171%
|
220−230
+3171%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−1860%
|
95−100
+1860%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 1−2
−8700%
|
85−90
+8700%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 9−10
−1433%
|
130−140
+1433%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−3171%
|
220−230
+3171%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−1860%
|
95−100
+1860%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8
−1800%
|
130−140
+1800%
|
| Fortnite | 14−16
−1179%
|
170−180
+1179%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
−1138%
|
160−170
+1138%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 6−7
−2067%
|
130−140
+2067%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−1138%
|
160−170
+1138%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 1−2
−8700%
|
85−90
+8700%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
−441%
|
230−240
+441%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 9−10
−1433%
|
130−140
+1433%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−3171%
|
220−230
+3171%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 50−55
−449%
|
280−290
+449%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−1860%
|
95−100
+1860%
|
| Dota 2 | 27−30
−1381%
|
400−450
+1381%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8
−1800%
|
130−140
+1800%
|
| Fortnite | 14−16
−1179%
|
170−180
+1179%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
−1138%
|
160−170
+1138%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 6−7
−2067%
|
130−140
+2067%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 7−8
−1814%
|
130−140
+1814%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
−1920%
|
100−110
+1920%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−1138%
|
160−170
+1138%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 1−2
−8700%
|
85−90
+8700%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6
−2433%
|
150−160
+2433%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
−441%
|
230−240
+441%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 9−10
−1433%
|
130−140
+1433%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−1860%
|
95−100
+1860%
|
| Dota 2 | 27−30
−1381%
|
400−450
+1381%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8
−1800%
|
130−140
+1800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
−1138%
|
160−170
+1138%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−1138%
|
160−170
+1138%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 1−2
−8700%
|
85−90
+8700%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3
−4967%
|
150−160
+4967%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
−1377%
|
650−700
+1377%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 14−16
−1179%
|
170−180
+1179%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−2625%
|
100−110
+2625%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 20−22
−1355%
|
290−300
+1355%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 1−2
−8500%
|
85−90
+8500%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−6100%
|
60−65
+6100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
−1300%
|
350−400
+1300%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−1021%
|
260−270
+1021%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−4900%
|
50−55
+4900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−2450%
|
100−110
+2450%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−1933%
|
120−130
+1933%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−2633%
|
80−85
+2633%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 5−6
−2140%
|
110−120
+2140%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−513%
|
90−95
+513%
|
| Valorant | 12−14
−1846%
|
250−260
+1846%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| Dota 2 | 7−8
−1329%
|
100−105
+1329%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−5600%
|
55−60
+5600%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−4000%
|
80−85
+4000%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−1867%
|
55−60
+1867%
|
| Sons of the Forest | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 3−4
−1767%
|
55−60
+1767%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
This is how R6 M340DX and RTX 5050 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX 5050 Mobile is 1400% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Sons of the Forest, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 5050 Mobile is 8700% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 5050 Mobile is ahead in 51 tests (91%)
- there's a draw in 5 tests (9%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.64 | 41.21 |
| Recency | 12 December 2015 | 24 June 2025 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 5 nm |
RTX 5050 Mobile has a 1461% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R6 M340DX in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
