Radeon RX 9070 vs R6 M340DX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R6 M340DX with Radeon RX 9070, including specs and performance data.

R6 M340DX
2015
2.46

RX 9070 outperforms R6 M340DX by a whopping 2163% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking81136
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data62.30
Power efficiencyno data20.35
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameJetNavi 48
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 December 2015 (9 years ago)6 March 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843584
Core clock speed955 MHz1330 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors690 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data220 Watt
Texture fill rate24.72564.5
Floating-point processing power0.791 TFLOPS36.13 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs24224
Tensor Coresno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data644.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−2100%
220−230
+2100%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.50

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−2600%
180−190
+2600%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−4229%
300−350
+4229%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2417%
150−160
+2417%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−2600%
180−190
+2600%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−1767%
160−170
+1767%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−4229%
300−350
+4229%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2417%
150−160
+2417%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−3240%
160−170
+3240%
Fortnite 14−16
−1950%
280−290
+1950%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1723%
230−240
+1723%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−4350%
170−180
+4350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1262%
170−180
+1262%
Valorant 40−45
−664%
300−350
+664%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−2600%
180−190
+2600%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−1767%
160−170
+1767%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−4229%
300−350
+4229%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
−445%
270−280
+445%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2417%
150−160
+2417%
Dota 2 27−30
−2122%
600−650
+2122%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−3240%
160−170
+3240%
Fortnite 14−16
−1950%
280−290
+1950%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1723%
230−240
+1723%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−4350%
170−180
+4350%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−2243%
160−170
+2243%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−2960%
150−160
+2960%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1262%
170−180
+1262%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−4033%
240−250
+4033%
Valorant 40−45
−664%
300−350
+664%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−1767%
160−170
+1767%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−2417%
150−160
+2417%
Dota 2 27−30
−2122%
600−650
+2122%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−3240%
160−170
+3240%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1723%
230−240
+1723%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1262%
170−180
+1262%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
−8167%
240−250
+8167%
Valorant 40−45
−664%
300−350
+664%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
−1950%
280−290
+1950%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−5933%
180−190
+5933%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−2300%
450−500
+2300%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−12700%
120−130
+12700%
Metro Exodus 0−1 100−105
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−661%
170−180
+661%
Valorant 24−27
−1488%
350−400
+1488%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4100%
80−85
+4100%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−3550%
140−150
+3550%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−3250%
200−210
+3250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−3325%
130−140
+3325%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−2920%
150−160
+2920%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−2600%
50−55
+2600%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−819%
140−150
+819%
Valorant 12−14
−2408%
300−350
+2408%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Dota 2 7−8
−2043%
150−160
+2043%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3033%
90−95
+3033%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−7450%
150−160
+7450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−3100%
95−100
+3100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−2533%
75−80
+2533%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

This is how R6 M340DX and RX 9070 compete in popular games:

  • RX 9070 is 2100% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 9070 is 12700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 9070 is ahead in 53 tests (90%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.46 55.67
Recency 12 December 2015 6 March 2025
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

RX 9070 has a 2163% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9070 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R6 M340DX in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R6 M340DX is a notebook card while Radeon RX 9070 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R6 M340DX
Radeon R6 M340DX
AMD Radeon RX 9070
Radeon RX 9070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 37 votes

Rate Radeon R6 M340DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 210 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R6 M340DX or Radeon RX 9070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.