VIA S3G UniChrome Pro II vs Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	837	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.76	no data
Architecture	GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)	no data
GPU code name	Bristol Ridge	Zoetrope
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 June 2016 (8 years ago)	1 October 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	no data
Boost clock speed	800 MHz	200 MHz
Number of transistors	3100 Million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	12-45 Watt	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size

medium sized

no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	no data
Shared memory	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

12 (FL 12_0)

no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency

1 June 2016

1 October 2006

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---