RTX A4000 vs Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

Place in the ranking	900	87
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.80	25.41
Architecture	GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)	Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code name	Bristol Ridge	GA104
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	1 June 2016 (9 years ago)	12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	6144
Core clock speed	no data	735 MHz
Boost clock speed	800 MHz	1560 MHz
Number of transistors	3100 Million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12-45 Watt	140 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	299.5
Floating-point processing power	no data	19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	96
TMUs	no data	192
Tensor Cores	no data	192
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	48
L1 Cache	no data	6 MB
L2 Cache	no data	4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	16 GB
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

no data

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (FL 12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6
DLSS	-	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−1900%

240−250
+1900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Hogwarts Legacy	7−8 −1900%	140−150 +1900%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	7−8 −1900%	140−150 +1900%
Counter-Strike 2	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1900%	120−130 +1900%
Fortnite	9 −1900%	180−190 +1900%
Forza Horizon 4	11 −1900%	220−230 +1900%
Forza Horizon 5	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Hogwarts Legacy	7−8 −1900%	140−150 +1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −1900%	240−250 +1900%
Valorant	40−45 −1973%	850−900 +1973%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	7−8 −1900%	140−150 +1900%
Counter-Strike 2	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	45−50 −1900%	900−950 +1900%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Dota 2	18 −1844%	350−400 +1844%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1900%	120−130 +1900%
Fortnite	10−12 −1900%	220−230 +1900%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −1900%	240−250 +1900%
Forza Horizon 5	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Grand Theft Auto V	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Hogwarts Legacy	7−8 −1900%	140−150 +1900%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −1900%	80−85 +1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −1900%	240−250 +1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6 −1900%	120−130 +1900%
Valorant	40−45 −1973%	850−900 +1973%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	7−8 −1900%	140−150 +1900%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Dota 2	17 −1959%	350−400 +1959%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1900%	120−130 +1900%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −1900%	240−250 +1900%
Hogwarts Legacy	7−8 −1900%	140−150 +1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −1900%	240−250 +1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −1900%	180−190 +1900%
Valorant	40−45 −1973%	850−900 +1973%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

10−12

−1900%

220−230
+1900%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	16−18 −1775%	300−310 +1775%
Grand Theft Auto V	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −1805%	400−450 +1805%
Valorant	18−20 −1844%	350−400 +1844%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1900%	60−65 +1900%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1900%	120−130 +1900%
Hogwarts Legacy	2−3 −1900%	40−45 +1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −1900%	60−65 +1900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

4−5

−1900%

80−85
+1900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −1775%	300−310 +1775%
Valorant	10−12 −1900%	220−230 +1900%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Dota 2	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −1900%	60−65 +1900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

3−4

−1900%

60−65
+1900%

This is how R5 (Bristol Ridge) and RTX A4000 compete in popular games:

RTX A4000 is 1900% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.12	44.06
Recency	1 June 2016	12 April 2021
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12 Watt	140 Watt

R5 (Bristol Ridge) has 1066.7% lower power consumption.

RTX A4000, on the other hand, has a 1978.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

RTX A4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

HD Graphics 620

RTX A4000

Quadro GV100

Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

GeForce GT 645M

HD Graphics 530

GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8

Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

RTX 5090 D

Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

HD 7400G

Radeon R6 (Carrizo)

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 25 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

4 704 votes

Rate RTX A4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) or RTX A4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.

RTX A4000 vs Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

Aggregate performance score

Contents

Primary details

Detailed specifications

Form factor & compatibility

VRAM capacity and type

Connectivity and outputs

API and SDK support

Gaming performance

Average FPS across all PC games

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

Vote for your favorite

Other comparisons

Community ratings

Comments