Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) vs R5 (Bristol Ridge)

Place in performance ranking	795	978
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)	GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code name	Bristol Ridge	Stoney Ridge
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 June 2016 (7 years ago)	1 June 2016 (7 years ago)
Current price	$53	no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	192
Boost clock speed	800 MHz	800 MHz
Number of transistors	3100 Million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12-45 Watt	12-45 Watt

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) and Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size

medium sized

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	64 Bit
Shared memory	+	+

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

12 (FL 12_0)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 (Bristol Ridge) 2.45
+84.2%

R5 (Stoney Ridge) 1.33

R5 (Bristol Ridge) outperforms R5 (Stoney Ridge) by 84% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R5 (Bristol Ridge) 1720
+36.1%

R5 (Stoney Ridge) 1264

R5 (Bristol Ridge) outperforms R5 (Stoney Ridge) by 36% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R5 (Bristol Ridge) 1284
+66.3%

R5 (Stoney Ridge) 772

R5 (Bristol Ridge) outperforms R5 (Stoney Ridge) by 66% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R5 (Bristol Ridge) 8256
+73.6%

R5 (Stoney Ridge) 4755

R5 (Bristol Ridge) outperforms R5 (Stoney Ridge) by 74% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

R5 (Bristol Ridge) 58018
+12.9%

R5 (Stoney Ridge) 51382

R5 (Bristol Ridge) outperforms R5 (Stoney Ridge) by 13% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

12
+50%

−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6
+25%

4−5

−25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −33.3%	4 +33.3%
Battlefield 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry 5	3−4 +200%	1 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 +0%	2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	11 +120%	5 −120%
Hitman 3	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +125%	4 −125%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Battlefield 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Hitman 3	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +200%	1 −200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6 +50%	4−5 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Battlefield 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Hitman 3	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Hitman 3	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%

This is how R5 (Bristol Ridge) and R5 (Stoney Ridge) compete in popular games:

R5 (Bristol Ridge) is 50% faster than R5 (Stoney Ridge) in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R5 (Bristol Ridge) is 400% faster than the R5 (Stoney Ridge).
in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the R5 (Stoney Ridge) is 33.3% faster than the R5 (Bristol Ridge).

All in all, in popular games: