Radeon R5 M435 vs R5 (Bristol Ridge)

Place in performance ranking	801	833
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.11
Architecture	GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	Bristol Ridge	Jet
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 June 2016 (8 years ago)	15 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Current price	$53	$120

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	320
Core clock speed	no data	780 MHz
Boost clock speed	800 MHz	1030 MHz
Number of transistors	3100 Million	690 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12-45 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	no data	20.60
Floating-point performance	no data	547.2 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) and Radeon R5 M435 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x8
Width	no data	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	no data	2 GB
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	4500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	36 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (FL 12_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	no data	5.1
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	no data	1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

13
+30%

10−12

−30%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6
+25%

4−5

−25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Battlefield 5	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry 5	4 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Forza Horizon 4	11 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Hitman 3	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7 +40%	5−6 −40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +25%	12−14 −25%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Battlefield 5	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Hitman 3	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6 +20%	5−6 −20%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +25%	12−14 −25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +21.4%	14−16 −21.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +25%	12−14 −25%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
+20%

5−6

−20%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Hitman 3	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
+20%

5−6

−20%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	1−2	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1