Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) vs R5 M420
Aggregated performance score
R5 (Stoney Ridge) outperforms R5 M420 by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 995 | 978 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | GCN (2011−2017) | GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016) |
GPU code name | Jet | Stoney Ridge |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 1 June 2016 (7 years ago) | 1 June 2016 (7 years ago) |
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | 800 MHz |
Number of transistors | 690 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 12-45 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 17.00 | no data |
Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops | no data |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on Radeon R5 M420 and Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | no data |
VRAM Capacity and Type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR3 | no data |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | no data |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | no data |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (FL 12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
OpenCL | 1.2 | no data |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 7−8
−14.3%
| 8
+14.3%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 5 |
Hitman 3 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
+75%
|
4
−75%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Hitman 3 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 2−3
+100%
|
1
−100%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
This is how R5 M420 and R5 (Stoney Ridge) compete in popular games:
- R5 (Stoney Ridge) is 14.3% faster than R5 M420 in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R5 M420 is 100% faster than the R5 (Stoney Ridge).
- in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the R5 (Stoney Ridge) is 33.3% faster than the R5 M420.
All in all, in popular games:
- R5 M420 is ahead in 2 tests (7%)
- R5 (Stoney Ridge) is ahead in 2 tests (7%)
- there's a draw in 25 tests (86%)
Pros & Cons Summary
Performance score | 1.27 | 1.33 |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R5 M420 and Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge).
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.