GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) vs Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1100not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)no data
GPU code nameBeema/MullinsMCP79MX
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)14 October 2008 (15 years ago)
Current priceno data$1030

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12816
Core clock speed350 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed686 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data282 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data12 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Shared memory++

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)10.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R3 (Mullins/Beema) 1815
+199%
9400M (G) / ION (LE) 607

Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) outperforms GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) by 199% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 April 2014 14 October 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm

We couldn't decide between Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) and GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE). We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 28 votes

Rate Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 37 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.