Radeon PRO W6300 vs Pro WX Vega M GL

Place in performance ranking	375	327
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.47	no data
Architecture	Vega (2017−2021)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	Vega Kaby Lake-G	Navi 24
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	7 January 2018 (6 years ago)	19 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price	$1359	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	768
Core clock speed	931 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1011 MHz	2040 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	80.88	97.92

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and Radeon PRO W6300 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	IGP	PCIe 4.0 x4
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	1024 Bit	32 Bit
Memory clock speed	1400 MHz	16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX Vega M GL 12.01

PRO W6300 15.25
+27%

PRO W6300 outperforms Pro WX Vega M GL by 27% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro WX Vega M GL 4643

PRO W6300 5897
+27%

PRO W6300 outperforms Pro WX Vega M GL by 27% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	50 −20%	60−65 +20%
4K	20 −20%	24−27 +20%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20

−26.3%

24−27
+26.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	33 −21.2%	40−45 +21.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −26.3%	24−27 +26.3%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −18.4%	45−50 +18.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −26.3%	24−27 +26.3%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −17.6%	40−45 +17.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −21.2%	40−45 +21.2%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −22%	50−55 +22%
Hitman 3	27−30 −11.1%	30−33 +11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −15.4%	45−50 +15.4%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −25%	45−50 +25%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −17.6%	40−45 +17.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −21.2%	40−45 +21.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −14.3%	24−27 +14.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27 −11.1%	30−33 +11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −26.3%	24−27 +26.3%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −18.4%	45−50 +18.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −26.3%	24−27 +26.3%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −17.6%	40−45 +17.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −21.2%	40−45 +21.2%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −22%	50−55 +22%
Hitman 3	27−30 −11.1%	30−33 +11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −15.4%	45−50 +15.4%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −25%	45−50 +25%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −17.6%	40−45 +17.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	44 −25%	55−60 +25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −14.3%	24−27 +14.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	17 −23.5%	21−24 +23.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −26.3%	24−27 +26.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −26.3%	24−27 +26.3%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −17.6%	40−45 +17.6%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −22%	50−55 +22%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −15.4%	45−50 +15.4%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −25%	45−50 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24 −25%	30−33 +25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −14.3%	24−27 +14.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

−17.6%

40−45
+17.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −17.4%	27−30 +17.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −14.3%	24−27 +14.3%
Hitman 3	16−18 −23.5%	21−24 +23.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −16.7%	14−16 +16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −26.3%	24−27 +26.3%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −22.7%	27−30 +22.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −20%	30−33 +20%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −26.3%	24−27 +26.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −26.3%	24−27 +26.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −16.7%	14−16 +16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	27−30 −11.1%	30−33 +11.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%
Hitman 3	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8 −25%	10−11 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	15 −20%	18−20 +20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10 −20%	12−14 +20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Battlefield 5	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −16.7%	14−16 +16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

−9.1%

12−14
+9.1%

This is how Pro WX Vega M GL and PRO W6300 compete in popular games:

PRO W6300 is 20% faster in 1080p
PRO W6300 is 20% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	12.01	15.25
Recency	7 January 2018	19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	25 Watt