T600 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200

Place in performance ranking	122	303
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.38	25.72
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Vega 10	TU117
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	13 August 2018 (5 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	no data
Current price	$2172 (2.2x MSRP)	$143

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

T600 has 148% better value for money than Pro WX 8200.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	640
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	735 MHz
Boost clock speed	1500 MHz	1335 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	336.0	53.40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.125	1.2
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 8200 35.82
+114%

T600 16.73

Radeon Pro WX 8200 outperforms T600 by 114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro WX 8200 13835
+114%

T600 6463

Radeon Pro WX 8200 outperforms T600 by 114% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	110−120 +100%	55 −100%
1440p	45−50 +95.7%	23 −95.7%
4K	40−45 +90.5%	21 −90.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

55−60
+112%

24−27

−112%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 +112%	30−35 −112%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +96.4%	27−30 −96.4%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +100%	55−60 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +106%	30−35 −106%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +112%	24−27 −112%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +105%	35−40 −105%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 +111%	45−50 −111%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +105%	75−80 −105%
Hitman 3	70−75 +112%	30−35 −112%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 +105%	73 −105%
Metro Exodus	110−120 +96.4%	55−60 −96.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 +107%	45−50 −107%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140 +100%	65 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +108%	50−55 −108%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 +112%	30−35 −112%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +96.4%	27−30 −96.4%
Battlefield 5	110−120 +100%	55−60 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +106%	30−35 −106%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +112%	24−27 −112%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +105%	35−40 −105%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 +111%	45−50 −111%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +105%	75−80 −105%
Hitman 3	70−75 +112%	30−35 −112%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 +109%	65−70 −109%
Metro Exodus	110−120 +96.4%	55−60 −96.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	95−100 +107%	45−50 −107%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−105 +96.1%	51 −96.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−105 +108%	48 −108%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +108%	50−55 −108%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 +112%	30−35 −112%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +96.4%	27−30 −96.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +106%	30−35 −106%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +112%	24−27 −112%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +105%	35−40 −105%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +105%	75−80 −105%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +105%	39 −105%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	95−100 +111%	45 −111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +104%	27 −104%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +108%	50−55 −108%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

95−100
+107%

45−50

−107%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +103%	30−35 −103%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +103%	30−35 −103%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +106%	16−18 −106%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +92.9%	14−16 −92.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +90.5%	21−24 −90.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +100%	9−10 −100%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +112%	26 −112%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +103%	30−35 −103%
Hitman 3	40−45 +100%	20−22 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +104%	27 −104%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +100%	30−33 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +103%	32 −103%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +94.4%	18−20 −94.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +90.9%	10−12 −90.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
+104%

27−30

−104%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 +87.5%	16−18 −87.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +100%	12−14 −100%
Hitman 3	24−27 +100%	12−14 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +94.4%	18−20 −94.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +90.9%	10−12 −90.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +87.5%	16 −87.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +110%	10−11 −110%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +100%	8−9 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +100%	9−10 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +100%	9−10 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +95.7%	21−24 −95.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +100%	15 −100%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +87.5%	16−18 −87.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33
+100%

14−16

−100%

This is how Pro WX 8200 and T600 compete in popular games:

Pro WX 8200 is 100% faster in 1080p
Pro WX 8200 is 96% faster in 1440p
Pro WX 8200 is 90% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	35.82	16.73
Recency	13 August 2018	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	40 Watt