Radeon RX 6700 XT vs Pro WX 8200

#ad 
Buy Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Instinct MI25 Radeon Pro V320 Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU Radeon Pro V340 Radeon Pro V340 8 GB Radeon Pro V340 16 GB Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU Radeon Pro WX 8100 Radeon Pro WX 8200 Radeon PRO WX 9100 Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled
VS
#ad 
Buy Radeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 6750 GRE Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB Radeon RX 6750 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 8200 with Radeon RX 6700 XT, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 8200
2018
8 GB HBM2, 230 Watt
30.96

RX 6700 XT outperforms Pro WX 8200 by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Pro WX 8200 Pro WX 8200
RX 6700 XT RX 6700 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking17162
Place by popularitynot in top-10098
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.5455.88
Power efficiency10.0015.20
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10Navi 22
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)3 March 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 $479

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 6700 XT has 128% better value for money than Pro WX 8200.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35842560
Core clock speed1200 MHz2321 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2581 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate336.0413.0
Floating-point processing power10.75 TFLOPS13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs224160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.1.1251.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro WX 8200 30.96
RX 6700 XT 47.05
+52%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 8200 13046
RX 6700 XT 19831
+52%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95−100
−56.8%
149
+56.8%
1440p50−55
−64%
82
+64%
4K30−35
−56.7%
47
+56.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p10.52
−227%
3.21
+227%
1440p19.98
−242%
5.84
+242%
4K33.30
−227%
10.19
+227%
  • RX 6700 XT has 227% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6700 XT has 242% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6700 XT has 227% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 349
+0%
349
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 119
+0%
119
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 170
+0%
170
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 347
+0%
347
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 99
+0%
99
+0%
Far Cry 5 178
+0%
178
+0%
Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 224
+0%
224
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 128
+0%
128
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 206
+0%
206
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 90
+0%
90
+0%
Dota 2 175
+0%
175
+0%
Far Cry 5 169
+0%
169
+0%
Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 200
+0%
200
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 161
+0%
161
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 99
+0%
99
+0%
Metro Exodus 119
+0%
119
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 223
+0%
223
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85
+0%
85
+0%
Dota 2 139
+0%
139
+0%
Far Cry 5 159
+0%
159
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 74
+0%
74
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 127
+0%
127
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 126
+0%
126
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 102
+0%
102
+0%
Metro Exodus 71
+0%
71
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
+0%
56
+0%
Far Cry 5 137
+0%
137
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 53
+0%
53
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 32
+0%
32
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 102
+0%
102
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 43
+0%
43
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+0%
74
+0%
Valorant 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Dota 2 106
+0%
106
+0%
Far Cry 5 71
+0%
71
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 29
+0%
29
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

This is how Pro WX 8200 and RX 6700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700 XT is 57% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6700 XT is 64% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6700 XT is 57% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 30.96 47.05
Recency 13 August 2018 3 March 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

RX 6700 XT has a 52% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 8200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 8200 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6700 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon RX 6700 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
Pro VII Radeon Pro VII
RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 6700 XT
vs
RTX 4060 GeForce RTX 4060
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
Vega Frontier Edition Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 5000
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
Pro WX 3200 Radeon Pro WX 3200
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
RX 5600 XT Radeon RX 5600 XT
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
RTX A5000 RTX A5000
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
RTX A4000 RTX A4000
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
Pro W6800 Radeon Pro W6800
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
Pro W6600 Radeon Pro W6600

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 27 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7310 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 8200 or Radeon RX 6700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.