L20 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 8200 and L20, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro WX 8200
2018
8 GB HBM2, 230 Watt
32.79

L20 outperforms Pro WX 8200 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking186176
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.08no data
Power efficiency10.098.69
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10AD102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)16 November 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores358411776
Core clock speed1200 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt275 Watt
Texture fill rate336.0927.4
Floating-point processing power10.75 TFLOPS59.35 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs224368
Tensor Coresno data368
Ray Tracing Coresno data92

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB48 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro WX 8200 32.79
L20 33.75
+2.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 8200 13046
L20 13429
+2.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.79 33.75
Recency 13 August 2018 16 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 275 Watt

Pro WX 8200 has 19.6% lower power consumption.

L20, on the other hand, has a 2.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro WX 8200 and L20.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200
NVIDIA L20
L20

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 27 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 40 votes

Rate L20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 8200 or L20, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.