Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro WX 7100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 7100 with Quadro T1000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 7100
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
20.35
+16.4%

Pro WX 7100 outperforms T1000 Max-Q by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking273316
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.04no data
Power efficiency10.8024.14
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameEllesmereTU117
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304896
Core clock speed1188 MHz765 MHz
Boost clock speed1243 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate179.075.60
Floating-point processing power5.728 TFLOPS2.419 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs14456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 7100 20.35
+16.4%
T1000 Max-Q 17.49

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 7100 7826
+16.4%
T1000 Max-Q 6724

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+16.1%
30−35
−16.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Elden Ring 65−70
+18.2%
55−60
−18.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+14.3%
55−60
−14.3%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+16.1%
30−35
−16.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+19.4%
70−75
−19.4%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+17%
45−50
−17%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+14.6%
40−45
−14.6%
Valorant 80−85
+17.1%
70−75
−17.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+14.3%
55−60
−14.3%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+16.1%
30−35
−16.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Dota 2 70−75
+16.1%
60−65
−16.1%
Elden Ring 65−70
+18.2%
55−60
−18.2%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+11.5%
60−65
−11.5%
Fortnite 100−110
+12.6%
95−100
−12.6%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+19.4%
70−75
−19.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+14.5%
60−65
−14.5%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+17%
45−50
−17%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+11.5%
120−130
−11.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+14.6%
40−45
−14.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+18.5%
50−55
−18.5%
Valorant 80−85
+17.1%
70−75
−17.1%
World of Tanks 230−240
+9.3%
210−220
−9.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+14.3%
55−60
−14.3%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+16.1%
30−35
−16.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Dota 2 70−75
+16.1%
60−65
−16.1%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+11.5%
60−65
−11.5%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+19.4%
70−75
−19.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+11.5%
120−130
−11.5%
Valorant 80−85
+17.1%
70−75
−17.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Elden Ring 30−35
+21.4%
27−30
−21.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+6.8%
160−170
−6.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
World of Tanks 130−140
+15%
120−130
−15%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+13.9%
35−40
−13.9%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+22.2%
45−50
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+18.2%
40−45
−18.2%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+17.9%
35−40
−17.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+21.7%
21−24
−21.7%
Valorant 50−55
+20.5%
40−45
−20.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Dota 2 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Elden Ring 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+17.3%
50−55
−17.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Dota 2 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+18.2%
21−24
−18.2%
Fortnite 24−27
+20%
20−22
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+20%
24−27
−20%
Valorant 24−27
+20%
20−22
−20%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Pro WX 7100 is 31% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro WX 7100 surpassed T1000 Max-Q in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.35 17.49
Recency 10 November 2016 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 50 Watt

Pro WX 7100 has a 16.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T1000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a workstation card while Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 58 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 18 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.