NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

Pro WX 7100
20.35
+26.7%

Radeon Pro WX 7100 outperforms Quadro M4000M by 27% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking251307
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money10.603.35
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code namePolaris 12GM204
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date1 March 2017 (7 years old)2 October 2015 (8 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data
Current price$582 (0.7x MSRP)$832
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro WX 7100 has 216% better value for money than M4000M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041,280
Core clock speedno data975 MHz
Boost clock speed1243 MHz1013 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate179.078.00
Floating-point performance5,728 gflops2,496 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro WX 7100 and Quadro M4000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7000 MHz5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s160 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+no data
Optimusno data+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDAno data5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 7100 20.35
+26.7%
M4000M 16.06

Radeon Pro WX 7100 outperforms Quadro M4000M by 27% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro WX 7100 7885
+26.7%
M4000M 6225

Radeon Pro WX 7100 outperforms Quadro M4000M by 27% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Pro WX 7100 38420
+102%
M4000M 18998

Radeon Pro WX 7100 outperforms Quadro M4000M by 102% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
+19%
63
−19%
4K24−27
+20%
20
−20%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+28%
24−27
−28%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+24.2%
30−35
−24.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+23.6%
55−60
−23.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+29.3%
40−45
−29.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+28%
24−27
−28%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+26.2%
40−45
−26.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+25%
40−45
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+25%
55−60
−25%
Hitman 3 55−60
+31.1%
45−50
−31.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+26.5%
30−35
−26.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+29.4%
30−35
−29.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+25.8%
30−35
−25.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+24.2%
30−35
−24.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+23.6%
55−60
−23.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+29.3%
40−45
−29.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+28%
24−27
−28%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+26.2%
40−45
−26.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+25%
40−45
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+25%
55−60
−25%
Hitman 3 55−60
+31.1%
45−50
−31.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+26.5%
30−35
−26.5%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+32%
24−27
−32%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+29.4%
30−35
−29.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+29.4%
30−35
−29.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+25.8%
30−35
−25.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+24.2%
30−35
−24.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+23.6%
55−60
−23.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+28%
24−27
−28%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+26.2%
40−45
−26.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+25%
40−45
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+25%
55−60
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+29.4%
30−35
−29.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+25.8%
30−35
−25.8%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Hitman 3 30−35
+32%
24−27
−32%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+22.7%
21−24
−22.7%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+33.3%
14−16
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+30%
20−22
−30%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+29.4%
16−18
−29.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+32.4%
30−35
−32.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+30.8%
24−27
−30.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+28.1%
30−35
−28.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+35.3%
16−18
−35.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%
Hitman 3 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+35.3%
16−18
−35.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+31.8%
21−24
−31.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%

This is how Pro WX 7100 and M4000M compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Pro WX 7100 is 19% faster than M4000M

4K resolution:

  • Pro WX 7100 is 20% faster than M4000M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Pro WX 7100 is 50% faster than the M4000M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro WX 7100 surpassed M4000M in all 68 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 20.35 16.06
Recency 1 March 2017 2 October 2015
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 100 Watt

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M4000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a workstation card while Quadro M4000M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Quadro M4000M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 47 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 116 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro M4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.