RTX A1000 Mobile vs Radeon Pro WX 4150
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4150 and RTX A1000 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
A1000 Mobile outperforms Pro 4150 by a whopping 263% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 611 | 270 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 9.53 | 28.82 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | Ampere (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | Baffin | GA107 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 1 March 2017 (8 years ago) | 30 March 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 896 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1002 MHz | 630 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1053 MHz | 1140 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 58.97 | 72.96 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.887 TFLOPS | 4.669 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 64 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 64 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | 2 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1375 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 176.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.6 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 18−20
−278%
| 68
+278%
|
| 1440p | 7−8
−286%
| 27
+286%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
−326%
|
130−140
+326%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−369%
|
61
+369%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
−292%
|
45−50
+292%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−241%
|
90−95
+241%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
−326%
|
130−140
+326%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−285%
|
50
+285%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−325%
|
85
+325%
|
| Fortnite | 35−40
−203%
|
110−120
+203%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−217%
|
90−95
+217%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 18−20
−306%
|
70−75
+306%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
−292%
|
45−50
+292%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
−291%
|
90−95
+291%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
−128%
|
160−170
+128%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−241%
|
90−95
+241%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
−326%
|
130−140
+326%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 100−110
−143%
|
250−260
+143%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−185%
|
37
+185%
|
| Dota 2 | 50−55
−120%
|
112
+120%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−295%
|
79
+295%
|
| Fortnite | 35−40
−203%
|
110−120
+203%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−217%
|
90−95
+217%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 18−20
−306%
|
70−75
+306%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
−296%
|
91
+296%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
−292%
|
45−50
+292%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
−242%
|
41
+242%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
−291%
|
90−95
+291%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
−400%
|
85
+400%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
−128%
|
160−170
+128%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−241%
|
90−95
+241%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−123%
|
29
+123%
|
| Dota 2 | 50−55
−159%
|
132
+159%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−265%
|
73
+265%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−217%
|
90−95
+217%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
−292%
|
45−50
+292%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
−291%
|
90−95
+291%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
−153%
|
43
+153%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
−128%
|
160−170
+128%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 35−40
−203%
|
110−120
+203%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
−308%
|
45−50
+308%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 45−50
−237%
|
160−170
+237%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 8−9
−425%
|
40−45
+425%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7
−300%
|
24
+300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
−358%
|
170−180
+358%
|
| Valorant | 70−75
−180%
|
190−200
+180%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 10−12
−491%
|
65−70
+491%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−360%
|
21−24
+360%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
−308%
|
50−55
+308%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−293%
|
55−60
+293%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 7−8
−271%
|
24−27
+271%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
−311%
|
35−40
+311%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 12−14
−323%
|
55−60
+323%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 18−20
−139%
|
40−45
+139%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 2−3
−650%
|
14−16
+650%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−1800%
|
18−20
+1800%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−750%
|
30−35
+750%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−322%
|
130−140
+322%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 5−6
−620%
|
35−40
+620%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−400%
|
10−11
+400%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
−235%
|
75−80
+235%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−350%
|
27−30
+350%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11
−300%
|
40−45
+300%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 2−3
−650%
|
14−16
+650%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−300%
|
24−27
+300%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 6−7
−317%
|
24−27
+317%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
This is how Pro WX 4150 and RTX A1000 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX A1000 Mobile is 278% faster in 1080p
- RTX A1000 Mobile is 286% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A1000 Mobile is 1800% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX A1000 Mobile performs better in 64 tests (97%)
- there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.92 | 21.48 |
| Recency | 1 March 2017 | 30 March 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 60 Watt |
Pro WX 4150 has 20% lower power consumption.
RTX A1000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 262.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.
The RTX A1000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4150 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
