Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Pro W6600M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W6600M with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

Pro W6600M
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 90 Watt
26.94

AI PRO R9700 outperforms Pro W6600M by a whopping 164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking23517
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.8418.11
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameNavi 23Navi 48
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date8 June 2021 (4 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17924096
Core clock speed1224 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed2034 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate227.8747.5
Floating-point processing power7.29 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs112256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Cores2864

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.31.3
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro W6600M 26.94
AI PRO R9700 71.19
+164%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W6600M 11287
AI PRO R9700 29830
+164%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 150−160
−158%
400−450
+158%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−162%
160−170
+162%
Hogwarts Legacy 55−60
−159%
150−160
+159%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−157%
270−280
+157%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
−158%
400−450
+158%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−162%
160−170
+162%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−158%
230−240
+158%
Fortnite 130−140
−131%
300−310
+131%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−159%
280−290
+159%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
−153%
220−230
+153%
Hogwarts Legacy 55−60
−159%
150−160
+159%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−157%
280−290
+157%
Valorant 180−190
−150%
450−500
+150%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−157%
270−280
+157%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
−158%
400−450
+158%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
−160%
700−750
+160%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−162%
160−170
+162%
Dota 2 120−130
−133%
300−310
+133%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−158%
230−240
+158%
Fortnite 130−140
−131%
300−310
+131%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−159%
280−290
+159%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
−153%
220−230
+153%
Grand Theft Auto V 95−100
−158%
250−260
+158%
Hogwarts Legacy 55−60
−159%
150−160
+159%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−158%
160−170
+158%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−157%
280−290
+157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
−159%
220−230
+159%
Valorant 180−190
−150%
450−500
+150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−157%
270−280
+157%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−162%
160−170
+162%
Dota 2 120−130
−133%
300−310
+133%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−158%
230−240
+158%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−159%
280−290
+159%
Hogwarts Legacy 55−60
−159%
150−160
+159%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−157%
280−290
+157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
−159%
220−230
+159%
Valorant 180−190
−150%
450−500
+150%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
−131%
300−310
+131%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−162%
160−170
+162%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
−159%
500−550
+159%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
−155%
130−140
+155%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−157%
95−100
+157%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−157%
450−500
+157%
Valorant 210−220
−152%
550−600
+152%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−153%
190−200
+153%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−150%
70−75
+150%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−150%
160−170
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−164%
190−200
+164%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
−158%
80−85
+158%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−161%
120−130
+161%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
−154%
170−180
+154%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−150%
70−75
+150%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
−164%
140−150
+164%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−150%
60−65
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−144%
100−105
+144%
Valorant 160−170
−145%
400−450
+145%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−156%
110−120
+156%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−150%
70−75
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Dota 2 85−90
−153%
220−230
+153%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−158%
85−90
+158%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−150%
120−130
+150%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−135%
40−45
+135%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−158%
80−85
+158%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−158%
80−85
+158%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.94 71.19
Recency 8 June 2021 23 July 2025
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 300 Watt

Pro W6600M has 233.3% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 164.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W6600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W6600M or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.