RTX A1000 vs Radeon Pro W6600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W6600M with RTX A1000, including specs and performance data.

Pro W6600M
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 90 Watt
26.03
+0.4%

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking216217
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.1938.00
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date8 June 2021 (3 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922304
Core clock speed1224 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speed2034 MHz1462 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate227.8105.3
Floating-point processing power7.29 TFLOPS6.737 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs11272
Tensor Coresno data72
Ray Tracing Cores2818

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro W6600M 26.03
+0.4%
RTX A1000 25.93

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W6600M 10805
+0.4%
RTX A1000 10766

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+1.3%
150−160
−1.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+2%
100−105
−2%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+1.3%
150−160
−1.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+1.2%
85−90
−1.2%
Fortnite 120−130
+5%
120−130
−5%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+4%
100−105
−4%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+3.8%
80−85
−3.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+4%
100−105
−4%
Valorant 170−180
+2.9%
170−180
−2.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+2%
100−105
−2%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+1.3%
150−160
−1.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+1.9%
260−270
−1.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%
Dota 2 120−130
+5.8%
120−130
−5.8%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+1.2%
85−90
−1.2%
Fortnite 120−130
+5%
120−130
−5%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+4%
100−105
−4%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+3.8%
80−85
−3.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 95−100
+5.6%
90−95
−5.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+4%
100−105
−4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+1.3%
80−85
−1.3%
Valorant 170−180
+2.9%
170−180
−2.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+2%
100−105
−2%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+5.5%
55−60
−5.5%
Dota 2 120−130
+5.8%
120−130
−5.8%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+1.2%
85−90
−1.2%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+4%
100−105
−4%
Hogwarts Legacy 55−60
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+4%
100−105
−4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+1.3%
80−85
−1.3%
Valorant 170−180
+2.9%
170−180
−2.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 120−130
+5%
120−130
−5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+2.2%
180−190
−2.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2.9%
170−180
−2.9%
Valorant 210−220
+1.9%
210−220
−1.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+2.9%
70−75
−2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+9.1%
55−60
−9.1%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+6.2%
65−70
−6.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Valorant 150−160
+3.3%
150−160
−3.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Dota 2 80−85
+5%
80−85
−5%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.03 25.93
Recency 8 June 2021 16 April 2024
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 50 Watt

Pro W6600M has a 0.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A1000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 80% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro W6600M and RTX A1000.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation card while RTX A1000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M
NVIDIA RTX A1000
RTX A1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 33 votes

Rate RTX A1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W6600M or RTX A1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.