GeForce RTX 4070 vs Radeon Pro W6600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W6600M with GeForce RTX 4070, including specs and performance data.

Pro W6600M
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 90 Watt
27.38

RTX 4070 outperforms Pro W6600M by a whopping 156% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking20520
Place by popularitynot in top-10034
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data60.42
Power efficiency20.9824.17
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23AD104
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date8 June 2021 (3 years ago)12 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17925888
Core clock speed1224 MHz1920 MHz
Boost clock speed2034 MHz2475 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate227.8455.4
Floating-point processing power7.29 TFLOPS29.15 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs112184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Cores2846

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data240 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s504.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W6600M 27.38
RTX 4070 70.10
+156%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W6600M 10525
RTX 4070 26941
+156%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD80−85
−171%
217
+171%
1440p45−50
−176%
124
+176%
4K30−35
−157%
77
+157%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.76
1440pno data4.83
4Kno data7.78

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−217%
160−170
+217%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−286%
216
+286%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−42.7%
110−120
+42.7%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−217%
160−170
+217%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−55.4%
87
+55.4%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−295%
482
+295%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
−151%
180−190
+151%
Metro Exodus 70−75
−145%
174
+145%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−117%
120−130
+117%
Valorant 100−110
−225%
350−400
+225%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−42.7%
110−120
+42.7%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−217%
160−170
+217%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−26.8%
71
+26.8%
Dota 2 90−95
−87.1%
174
+87.1%
Far Cry 5 80−85
−92.6%
156
+92.6%
Fortnite 130−140
−106%
270−280
+106%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−208%
376
+208%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
−151%
180−190
+151%
Grand Theft Auto V 90−95
−89.1%
174
+89.1%
Metro Exodus 70−75
−110%
149
+110%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−29.5%
210−220
+29.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−117%
120−130
+117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
−93.3%
170−180
+93.3%
Valorant 100−110
−225%
350−400
+225%
World of Tanks 260−270
−4.9%
270−280
+4.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−42.7%
110−120
+42.7%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−217%
160−170
+217%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−14.3%
64
+14.3%
Dota 2 90−95
−147%
230−240
+147%
Far Cry 5 80−85
−63%
130−140
+63%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−164%
322
+164%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
−151%
180−190
+151%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−29.5%
210−220
+29.5%
Valorant 100−110
−225%
350−400
+225%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 45−50
−191%
137
+191%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−191%
137
+191%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−260%
90−95
+260%
World of Tanks 170−180
−176%
450−500
+176%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−58.2%
85−90
+58.2%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−206%
95−100
+206%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−66.7%
40
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 80−85
−95.1%
160−170
+95.1%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−200%
222
+200%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−205%
130−140
+205%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−131%
143
+131%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−271%
150−160
+271%
Valorant 75−80
−301%
300−350
+301%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−248%
85−90
+248%
Dota 2 45−50
−204%
146
+204%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−204%
146
+204%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−210%
65
+210%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−149%
200−210
+149%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−259%
60−65
+259%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−204%
146
+204%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−214%
90−95
+214%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−248%
85−90
+248%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−80%
18
+80%
Dota 2 45−50
−150%
120−130
+150%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−184%
100−110
+184%
Fortnite 35−40
−174%
95−100
+174%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−181%
121
+181%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
−250%
80−85
+250%
Valorant 35−40
−376%
170−180
+376%

This is how Pro W6600M and RTX 4070 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 is 171% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 is 176% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 is 157% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4070 is 376% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 is ahead in 61 test (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.38 70.10
Recency 8 June 2021 12 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 200 Watt

Pro W6600M has 122.2% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070, on the other hand, has a 156% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W6600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4070 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 9756 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.