RTX A2000 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro W6400

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking260not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.95no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 24GA106
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date19 January 2022 (2 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682560
Core clock speed2331 MHz682 MHz
Boost clock speed2331 MHz1207 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate111.996.56
Floating-point processing power3.58 TFLOPS6.18 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs4880
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Cores1220

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s176.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 January 2022 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 6 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 95 Watt

Pro W6400 has an age advantage of 9 months, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 90% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6400 and RTX A2000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6400 is a workstation card while RTX A2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6400
Radeon Pro W6400
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q
RTX A2000 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 28 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.